@BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square59arrow-up1206file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksartificial_intel@lemmy.mlnottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1206external-linkAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.com@BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square59file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksartificial_intel@lemmy.mlnottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoA human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
minus-square@fishos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoYeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).
A human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
Yeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).