• HACKthePRISONS
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    >Go back through that list and actually address each point

    literally demanding i deal with a gish gallop.

    no.

    • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      It wasn’t a Gish gallop. It was a simple list of the hallmarks of fascism, with examples for each. It was stupidly easy to do, and it should be just as easy for you to rebut if your point has merit.

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        > it should be just as easy for you to rebut if your point has merit.

        your framing is fallacious. of course there are differences between the republicans and democrats in rhetoric and policy, but both of them are fascist.

        • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          your framing is fallacious.

          How, exactly? Your point was both sides are fascist. I disagreed, with the counterpoint that fascism means x, providing examples of republican fascism, and asking for examples of democrat fascism.

          I’m challenging you to back up your original thesis. That’s literally how debate works.

          • HACKthePRISONS
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            >How, exactly?

            i explain in the second half of the comment. i don’t want to spoil the anticipation for you.

            • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Restating your original incorrect thesis does not explain anything.

              ‘They’re both fascist.’

              ‘No they’re not, and here’s why, with examples. Please prove your point.’

              ‘Yes they are.’ <— this is not proof.