• frog 🐸
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Nope, I think they would still be right. No matter what, a baby’s shit-covered arse doesn’t belong on a table in a restaurant. That’s just gross.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        Exactly right, it doesn’t.

        Which is why the owners are responsible for providing the safe clean place for them.

        • frog 🐸
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 years ago

          Making the other customers suffer, and potentially get ill, isn’t a reasonable response to a business doing something shitty. Just don’t go to restaurants that don’t provide baby-changing facilities. Don’t expose innocent people to your baby’s shit.

            • frog 🐸
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 years ago

              Nope, inflicting excrement on innocent people is never an appropriate response.

              • @MagicShel@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                52 years ago

                Collateral damage in a just war. Don’t patronize restaurants that charge for the restroom and you’re in the clear there, while also being on the morally correct side of history.

                • frog 🐸
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  I don’t patronise restaurants that charge for toilet use. But that doesn’t put me on the side of parents who put their baby’s shitty arse on tables where people eat. Both sides of this “war” are shitty people that I want nothing to do with.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Practically for their customers.

            Ideologically and wistfully for everyone.

            • HeartyBeast
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              My local authority in East London pays local cafes a small amount if they make their toilets available to the general public and display a sign on the door. This feels like a good pragmatic solution to me.

              • frog 🐸
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                Yeah, that is definitely a nice, pragmatic solution. I imagine it’s cheaper for the local council than running public toilets themselves, too.