• @mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Your comment in no way negates my observation. If the clickbait title of the article was “You probably don’t need a VPN to avoid market tracking” or something similar, you’d have a point.

    • Gamma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I was simply adding information your comment had left out, it wasn’t negating information at all. So congrats on getting the point, not everyone is trying to argue 🎉

        • @ConstableJelly@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Neutral party here, I read it naturally as a supplement to your comment, not an opposition. I don’t detect an argumentative tone personally.

          • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            You’re welcome to your opinion but these phrases

            I feel like the opening sentences explained the reasoning behind the article sufficiently,

            They’re not the only ones pointing this out, either.

            are oppositional in tone.

              • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I didn’t ask you. I didn’t ask the other neutral guy either. Not my issue that you have a problem with me suggesting the original respondent check his phrasing to make his intention clear, or pointing out the specific phrases that make it unclear.

                • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 years ago

                  “Everybody on this highway is driving in the wrong lane! What a bunch of idiots!”