• @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Are you suggesting that human shields have more value than the people who is being mortally attacked from behind the shields?

      • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I don’t agree with that nice sounding platitude. Terrorists and pedophiles lives don’t have the same worth as a nobel price winner to society.

        • AphoticDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Wonderful example, considering anybody can be nominated and win a Nobel peace prize, including people guilty of ethnic cleansing.

          • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            somehow I’m not surprised that you can’t even think about science and how it contributes to civilization. you are being intellectually dishonest by claiming that we are all equal and then you pick the worst possible example from the group instead of picking the best representatives of nobel prize winners before comparing them with terrorists.

            but sure I’ll take anyone from the list of nobel prize winners (which in my opinion are usually political) over someone that puts babies in ovens and burns them alive. it’s not really that complicated as you are trying to make it seem, even when you pick a strawman interpretation of my comment.

        • @RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          That’s a moral judgment. Worth has nothing to do with it.

          All things, by virtue of their existence, have equal worth.