☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agoChina has grown more new forest cover than any nation on Earthmedia.mas.toimagemessage-square116arrow-up1111file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1111imageChina has grown more new forest cover than any nation on Earthmedia.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square116file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
minus-square@jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink11•2 years agoI am always happy to hear about reforestation, but has somebody understood out of which source the numbers from china are coming? I mean they are sometimes quite the enthusiasts talking about their successes
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlinkfedilink19•2 years agoyou managed to fit so much seething and coping into a single comment
minus-squareHornyOnMain [she/her]linkfedilinkEnglish19•edit-22 years agothe article linked cites the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations as its source, so it’s not using china’s numbers for this
minus-square@jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink3•2 years agoOkay thanks, I guess I overlooked that :)
minus-square@freagle@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilink15•2 years agoSource for your claim that they sometimes lie about their accomplishments?
minus-square@zerfuffle@lemmy.mllinkfedilink13•2 years agoIt’s not like forest cover is hard to verify by satellite imagery. Lying about reforestation and deforestation is hard.
minus-square@stifle867@programming.devlinkfedilink7•edit-22 years agoThe satellite imagery shows a net loss compared to CCP figures which show a net gain. China lies more easily than it tells the truth.
minus-square@stifle867@programming.devlinkfedilink2•2 years agoHere’s your source https://youtu.be/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
minus-square@zerfuffle@lemmy.mllinkfedilink3•2 years agoprogramming.dev back at it with the shit takes
minus-square@PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
I am always happy to hear about reforestation, but has somebody understood out of which source the numbers from china are coming? I mean they are sometimes quite the enthusiasts talking about their successes
you managed to fit so much seething and coping into a single comment
the article linked cites the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations as its source, so it’s not using china’s numbers for this
Okay thanks, I guess I overlooked that :)
Source for your claim that they sometimes lie about their accomplishments?
It’s not like forest cover is hard to verify by satellite imagery. Lying about reforestation and deforestation is hard.
The satellite imagery shows a net loss compared to CCP figures which show a net gain. China lies more easily than it tells the truth.
Here’s your source https://youtu.be/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
programming.dev back at it with the shit takes
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/3_lAb8m9MpI?si=IrfZYXXuC1BNf2op
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.