His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

    • @AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      222 years ago

      Not covered, IMO. A pharmacist isn’t writing the scrip and isn’t administering the treatment. They’re merely completing a retail transaction, albeit one with a lot of paperwork. If they have a moral position against doing their job as prescribed by law, they should find a new job.

      A care provider, like a doctor or nurse, has personal involvement with the patient. I’m ok with refusing to perform a procedure they disagree with, as long as there is no negative impact for the patient.

    • @Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Pharmacists are a strictly regulated profession. The whole job is filling prescriptions ordered by doctors and informing customers (patients) about the safe use of the substances. It’s not a creative process and it’s not their choice to prescribe or deny medication.

      Last I checked bakers and photographers are barely regulated by comparison, and you could easily consider their work creative in nature.

    • @Yawnder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Humn… that’s a tough one tbh.

      On one side I would say what the others are replying to you said, but on the other side I could see myself not wanting to dispense the drugs for an execution. (I know they’re not going through the pharmacy, but let’s pretend they did.)

      I would be inclined to say it’s not “performative” and say they have to though.

      Tough one.