His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • @njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    362 years ago

    Even more than the outright bigotry, what concerns me most is this growing trend of conservative ideology that allows for lawsuits without cause. You shouldn’t be able to sue unless you are harmed. That’s the way its supposed to work. Yet these conservative courts have been turning that concept entirely on its head lately.

    • @cricket98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Um that’s not true at all. You are absolutely allowed to challenge the precedence of laws even if you have been yet to be directly affected.

    • @Yawnder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      So no speeding tickets, no health inspection, no mandatory safety procedures, etc.?

      All of that is enforced through laws that originate from lawsuits.

        • @Yawnder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          “you shouldn’t be able to sue unless you are harmed” means there wouldn’t be ground for protective things. That’s what I mean.

          You DUI? As long as this time you didn’t hit anyone, no fines / lawsuit?

          • @FireTower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I think you’re not appreciating the difference between a criminal violation and a civil tort. In civil law plaintiffs are required to claim damages. This is a means to ensure the system isn’t full of pointless petty lawsuits.

            • @Yawnder@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I gave just one example, but there are others like copyrights, patents, etc., in which you sue without having damage.