@i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comexternal-linkmessage-square24arrow-up1224
arrow-up1224external-linkScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.com@i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square24
minus-square@TheHolyChecksum@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish13•2 years agoOf course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
minus-square@i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agowhat about creativity? does it promote creativity?
minus-square@RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•2 years agoHow the fuck are you supposed to be creative when you have no free time
minus-squareDenvillinkfedilinkEnglish8•2 years agoIt promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
Of course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
what about creativity? does it promote creativity?
How the fuck are you supposed to be creative when you have no free time
It promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
deleted by creator