For me I would hold the social media companies more to account when it comes to hate speech and harassment online and force social media companies to do more to stop online harassment and hate speech.
For me I would hold the social media companies more to account when it comes to hate speech and harassment online and force social media companies to do more to stop online harassment and hate speech.
deleted by creator
@Dyskolos @darq “But how can I hear “diverse opinion” if X opinions are banned/blocked/moderated in the first place?” i believe Stormfront has chat forums
deleted by creator
@Dyskolos no. i’m pointing out that your argument is dishonest. nothing is stopping you hearing diverse opinions. you are arguing for nowhere to be able to have their own standards which is a separate, harder lift than “fReAzE PeAcH!?!”
Did you forgot what the initial post was I replied to? That censoring hate-speech IS cancel-culture. But you referring me to some nazi-forums (I assume they are considering the title) because I’m for free speech? Not even considering how restrictive Nazis usually are, you can’t even be non-white to speak. Totally makes sense. Not. I’m for free speech since the internet was born. If you’re really not 12 you might remember the ribbon-banners later on. It just died. Free speech is dead. We’re even at a point where billionaires buy a platform that spreads shit they don’t like and change it.
@Dyskolos no. i’m referring you to stormfront because it’s both the trivial and irrefutable rebuttal to your nonsense argument, and because it’s funny. i do recall the original post. i also recall your last post. i mention this only because apparently you don’t as you keep on being confused by my addressing it
deleted by creator
@darq @Dyskolos “reductio ad riduculum” doesn’t mean what you think it means. if i could give you a helpful tip, using latin to try and appear smarter than you are often backfires. as in this case. “you used a formal logic technique to disprove my point so i quit” is not the slam dunk rebuttal you seem to think it is. That said, gonna tap out now. battle of wits with a clearly unarmed opponent isn’t sporting
There is no space where all opinions are welcome. It simply does not exist. Some opinions are going to force out others.
If you run a space where Nazi opinions are okay to speak, you can’t really expect to hear Jewish opinions. Or opinions of PoC or queer people or disabled people and so on and so on.
So most places do the calculations. You can ban this one view. And in return an entire spectrum of views becomes more welcome.
Bigotry is a painfully simple, painfully shallow, and painfully boring viewpoint. It is almost completely one-dimensional, simplifiable to the idea that the “other” is inferior or dangerous and is to be shunned or feared. It is a viewpoint that we all already know, one we have all already heard. Banning it loses us almost nothing, and in return we gain so, so many more valuable insights.
deleted by creator
I’d urge you to try and read my comments again.
@Dyskolos @darq
"But what insights do we gain from banning them? "
We gain the insights of anybody who would be chased out of the discussion by the nazis being there.
deleted by creator
@Dyskolos Moderation makes sure I don’t get *too* many internet perverts sharing their most horrible fantasies with me. I rather like it actually.
@darq
I have no idea where you are to receive such things. I never did, and I’m on the net since it started.