• @tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Honestly? Yeah I don’t see any way around this than to simply predicate all aid to the region on conditions.

      1. Israel on the demand that not one more brick be laid anywhere outside Israel’s borders and a plan with enforcement mechanisms to dismantle the settlements that are there in order to guarantee the possibility of a sustainable Palestinian state with an economy under their own control (I.e that trade, commerce, construction, monetary policy be Palestinian and not imposed by Israel). That reparations be paid to families of the victims of this bombing campaign and settler violence over the years, that those who perpetrated violence be brought to justice.

      2. Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return, that they apprehend and surrender all militants to an international tribunal, that they recognize Israel, that they pay reparations to the families of Israelis that have been killed over the years.

      3. Egypt and Jordan on the demand that they participate in the enforcement of the above.

      4. for all parties, that Jerusalem be declared either an international city, or joint capital (split East-West).

      5. that Iran be completely isolated from the region. This is a tough one, they have their fingers deep within Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon.

      It’s unclear how anything else can work.

      If this requires a permanent UN military mission with the right to shoot to kill any threat all along the border of both Palestine and Israel, I’m fine with it. If it means Israel bitches and moans about how unfair it is, who cares. It’s about time they respected and enforced the law. If it means Palestinians need to fight to dismantle their own militant orgs and fight for peace, at least they will have a light at the end of that tunnel instead of the despair of the past 70 years (and earlier too, tbh).

      • Quokka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah, nah.

        That option lets Israel get away with everything and punishes everyone else in the region.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return…

        One wonders why it should be Palestine that gives up this right. Remember, it was Israeli paramilitaries that took over the Palestine Mandate despite (admittedly fucked up) plans by the UN for after British colonial rule left.

        Like, your argument is basically fate-acompli. It’s a horribly complicated thing, but unilaterally evicting one party from a homeland isn’t going to lead to peace.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            So palistinians should give up on access to their (equally ancient) homeland?

          • @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            “Afrikaners will never accept losing the majority to blacks” - South African apologists in the 1980s.

            If your nation depends on apartheid, it must be rebuilt on a foundation of justice.

    • Annoyed_🦀
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      And i thought my plan of putting both in a room with only water and only release them when there’s a peace treaty is brilliant.

      Visiting titanic will be nice.