Curious if this will ever become a concept to help put a stop to spam/bots.

  • @hahattpro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    No, objection.

    Lemmy should not have the mech to censor, and should not have algorithm ranking/censoring, …

    • ChiwaWithMujicanoHat
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      By having an upvote / downvote system it already has a censoring and ranking system.

      If you look at most threads people downvote dissenting opinions regardless of the quality of their arguments, some instances become echo chambers that way.

      You can easily control the narrative by upvoting someone that argues against you, most people will see your comment as

      1 upvote 1 downvote

      And the person arguing with you as

      2 upvotes

      Therefore they will be biased to downvote you further and upvote the other person as their social calibration defaults to thinking you are in the wrong as someone else said so already, it’s more economical that way as you won’t really have to do that assessment.

      It’s a very interesting phenomenon and I’d like to do some formal testing with it across multiple social media with upvote/downvote functions, but I believe it does censor opinions that do not adhere to the usual feelings of the majority.

      • @wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Just to point out that identities of upvoters / downvoters are visible on the fediverse. Though granted, you could use a proxy account for the voting