dsafdsfdsfdsfsdfsd

    • Madis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      The issue is that they required websites to implement the banner, instead of just implementing a standard (like this one) and letting browsers handle the UI. Imagine just telling your browser once what kind of cookies you are okay with and all websites adhere…

      • @Aasikki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Good example of good intentions with a bad or suboptimal outcome. I really hope we can get a standard like that eventually.

    • HiramFromTheChi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      lol I saw someone else last year complaining about GDPR because they thought clicking cookie banners was annoying. But it’s like… don’t be mad at GDPR for making you click banners that warn you about invasive practices, be mad at the fact that the invasive practices are allowed in the first place.

      I actually run a directory of companies and products that don’t use invasive tracking cookies called CookieSlayers in an effort to make people aware of better alternatives, and ultimately build a better web. Feel free to contribute to it.

        • HiramFromTheChi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          First-party cookies, yes, third-party cookies, no. There are good cookies and there are bad cookies. CookieSlayers is a directory focused on good cookies.