• @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      There’s thousands of prolific Wikipedia contributors. Writing high quality articles takes a lot of time.

      So no

      • AnyOldName3
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        It was reasonably big news when it was noticed, so it’s not unreasonable that people might remember it. IIRC, the gist of it was one contributor that had historically contributed to a large number of articles added a redirect for every article with breast in the name so you could also access it by replacing breast with titty or boob, so for example, typing titty cancer into the search bar would bring you to the page for breast cancer.

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Yeah I’m not buying it. Until I see some stats on the normal level of boob fascination I can’t conclude this guy was extreme

      • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Gee I don’t know let’s have a look:

        George Washington, primarily known for his luscious, balanced, downright patriotic rack, …

        … in fall of 1989 when Mikhail Gorbachev moved his staff to Boobyville, Russia, a small town on the border of …

        … contended that the solar system is comprised of approximately .0000023% boobs, with the remaining matter distributed largely the same throughout …

        It’s getting out of hand I’d say

        • @Rizoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          All of those are funny and obviously untrue. Using Wikipedia isn’t a one stop perfect information system. Knowing how to use it comes with knowing how to use the sources.

          • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Well Wikipedia is striving to be a perfect information system. So they don’t belong there. There are better locations on the internet for those kinds of jokes.

    • @Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The Scots guy is a better example, imo. Someone who was trying to contribute in a positive manner but filled the wiki with complete gibberish, as opposed to a troll, of which there many.