• @Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You’ll be able to play a new game with state of the art graphics at medium settings with a mid range GPU from 3 years ago. Seems fine to me.

    We don’t know what medium settings actually mean. It may still look amazing.

    For Control (2019) the first released minium system requirements had a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 from 2016. This was later lowered but that’s pretty much in line with what we see now. They’re aiming for next gen graphics. It worked for Control. The game was used as a benchmark for raytracing for years.

    • @FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      At 540p. That’s less than 720p. How the fuck is that even remotely acceptable? Medium settings at 1080p would be barely acceptable. But literally half the resolution? No way.

      • @Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        You still don’t know what medium means. Until you do it’s pretty pointless to get worked up about linguistics.

          • @Hasuris@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Maybe the graphics are that intense, even at whatever they chose to call “medium”. Try “low” then and see how those work out.

            You are worked up about linguistics because it’s nothing more to you at the moment. Just because you’re used to run every other game at “high” or whatever, doesn’t mean this different game has to be the same.

            I refuse to agree with “my midrange GPU has to be able to run everything at Ultra for #random number# of years or I am going ballistics”. I want progress. That’s what I buy new hardware for every few years. If you want graphics to be stuck and don’t advance in any meaningful way, get a console.