dsafdsfdsfdsfsdfsd

  • @N1cknamed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Not sure how removable batteries make a phone more flimsy. The back might pop off when you drop it, sure, but isn’t that preferable to having it crack?

    • BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      The usual argument manufacturers present is that water-proofing a phone involves having its interior be as completely sealed as possible, whereas a removable battery obviously requires that its interior be at least vaguely accessible, so it makes water-proofing substantially more challenging. Additionally, they can’t be as efficient with packing the internals tightly since the battery has to be accessible without completely disassembling the entire phone, so devices have to be a bit thicker.

      I won’t pretend to have enough knowledge about device manufacturing to known just how sound those arguments are, but that’s what they say.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Most phones today are less waterproof than when they had replaceable batteries. There’s no connection between the two, it’s a red herring.

        • @BudFactory@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          I mean rubber seals and o-rings exist. If I remember correctly the law doesn’t demand easily swappable batteries, but rather them to be replaceable at all. So just use screws to hold the backplate in place, it could even look somewhat cool like on a Royal Oak Watch.

        • QuinceDaPence
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Samsung used to make the “Active” lne of Galaxy phones which were waterproof shock resistent and had removable backs and batteries and a way for the phone to detect if the back was properly sealed.