@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agoStarfield Desperately Needs More Unique Locationswww.thegamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square51arrow-up1191
arrow-up1191external-linkStarfield Desperately Needs More Unique Locationswww.thegamer.com@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square51
minus-square@RealFknNito@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish19•2 years agoAn open world game with loading screens between locations is like toll booths every mile on a highway. More locations doesn’t mean much if getting there is the same slog it currently is.
minus-squareThrowawaylinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoYeah. What we need is more locations in the same worldspace. That qualifier is important.
minus-square@Aggregate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoThis is why I’ll never understand people who get excited about news like “We have over 1000 planets!” Spend all that time and effort making like, 15 really complete, kick ass ones in the same physical space that I can explore instead.
An open world game with loading screens between locations is like toll booths every mile on a highway. More locations doesn’t mean much if getting there is the same slog it currently is.
Yeah. What we need is more locations in the same worldspace.
That qualifier is important.
This is why I’ll never understand people who get excited about news like “We have over 1000 planets!”
Spend all that time and effort making like, 15 really complete, kick ass ones in the same physical space that I can explore instead.