• @corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      Those links just say that illegal content uploaded to Microsoft services might get your account suspended, which is how pretty much every online service works. There’s a higher bar than “misbehavior”.

        • @corbin@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 years ago

          That’s a video editorializing the article that was already editorializing the Microsoft support pages. That’s just a game of telephone with everyone in the process trying to make it sound scarier than it actually is.

          • @Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            If you added your Microsoft account to your windows, then you use their services and therefore agree to the new SLAs, to do whatever they please. It’s vague on purpose, to give them maximum freedom to do so. That they scan your uploads is nothing new.

            • AnonTwo
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              You’re just saying how most TOA’s are…they’re hardly ever enforced that way, just because of the publicity it would give them. And most TOA’s aren’t even legally binding and this is definitely something that would face litigation.

              If your issue with it is the vagueness, you might as well get off the grid now. Most TOA’s are written that way.

        • @Tetsuo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No subtitles available for this video.

          Besides your links are too generic, if you want to properly demonstrate your theory you will need to at least quote the relevant part and especially the parts about AI.

          • @Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I don’t know anymore. Maybe the author of the video is wrong and the 1000 comments as well. I personally see it on Microsoft to be more clear. They got to be more precise, else you have enough room to do whatever you please. Scanning content can always get extended to other means. First it’s for a legit reason like protection children but later they extend it. Giving them options to do that, isn’t good.

    • AnonTwo
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Sources that don’t actually prove anything aren’t good sources…