@TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agothe FDA is considering a ban on menthol cigarette saleswww.verifythis.commessage-square151arrow-up1232
arrow-up1232external-linkthe FDA is considering a ban on menthol cigarette saleswww.verifythis.com@TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square151
minus-squarexigoilinkfedilink3•2 years agoYeah, which is why illegal drugs have more users than legal drugs (alcohol and tobacco). Except they don’t.
minus-square@papalonian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 years agoTheir argument was that banning cigarettes wouldn’t eliminate their use, only drive people to continue doing it through other methods. What does your comment have to do with that…? Nobody said there would somehow be more users than before, just that people would continue doing it…
minus-squarexigoilinkfedilink1•2 years agoMy argument is that since illegal drugs have significantly fewer users, prohibition does reduce usage.
minus-square@SCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•edit-22 years agoThe same number of people, as a percentage, smoke marijuana as smoke cigarettes. Marijuana use is federally illegal and illegal in most states. So no, it really doesn’t reduce usage. Price and perceived risk are the two factors that reduce usage the most.
minus-squarexigoilinkfedilink1•2 years agoI don’t know about the USA, but I see tobacco smokers every day and very rarely see marijuana smokers.
minus-square@papalonian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoMost people smoking weed aren’t just doing it out in the open like tobacco users
minus-squarexigoilinkfedilink1•2 years agoWell, then the prohibition has pretty much fulfilled its purpose.
minus-square@papalonian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoWhen the government makes something illegal, they don’t do it in hopes of millions of people doing it anyways in private.
minus-squarexigoilinkfedilink1•2 years agoMaybe not for other laws, but it makes sense for drugs. The important thing is that people should have the right to breathe non-poisonous air, and forcing smokers to hide their smoking achieves that.
Yeah, which is why illegal drugs have more users than legal drugs (alcohol and tobacco). Except they don’t.
Their argument was that banning cigarettes wouldn’t eliminate their use, only drive people to continue doing it through other methods.
What does your comment have to do with that…? Nobody said there would somehow be more users than before, just that people would continue doing it…
My argument is that since illegal drugs have significantly fewer users, prohibition does reduce usage.
The same number of people, as a percentage, smoke marijuana as smoke cigarettes. Marijuana use is federally illegal and illegal in most states.
So no, it really doesn’t reduce usage. Price and perceived risk are the two factors that reduce usage the most.
I don’t know about the USA, but I see tobacco smokers every day and very rarely see marijuana smokers.
Most people smoking weed aren’t just doing it out in the open like tobacco users
Well, then the prohibition has pretty much fulfilled its purpose.
When the government makes something illegal, they don’t do it in hopes of millions of people doing it anyways in private.
Maybe not for other laws, but it makes sense for drugs. The important thing is that people should have the right to breathe non-poisonous air, and forcing smokers to hide their smoking achieves that.
deleted by creator