• @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Probably not an eco-friendly move

    Fine powder of metals strewn over a few km², there’s more coming from outer space via micrometeorites and dust. And that bit CO² in the Stratosphere…

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Also counterintuitively, you need some fuel to deorbit, which adds payload weight at launch and requires more fuel in the first place.

        For example, getting a unit of rocket fuel to the Moon requires about ten times as much at launch.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Yes, it takes little fuel to destabilize one’s orbit and eventually enter the atmosphere to burn up. It’s more difficult if you need to make sure that the craft doesn’t take others down during the procedure.

        • @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Starlink’s only have fuel because of the initial lower orbit, as far as i know. Wasn’t that to test them, for radiation and so on?