An author's clash with a Georgia school district over a brief mention of homosexuality in a presentation highlights the reach of conservatives' push for what what they call parents' rights.
OP is making a point that the visibility of queer and other minorities in history and in public is more important than the visibility of straight/non-minority people. Their point was that non-minority groups aren’t hated and target for who they are unlike minority groups. It is important to display and teach about the humanity of different groups in order to prevent mistrust and violence against them by the majorities.
If you really didn’t understand this then you should get your head out of your ass and wake up to reality.
Calm down, no need to resort to personal insults. Rule #1: Be civil.
It seems the guy you’re talking about doesn’t understand my point. Here’s my other post on the matter that can explain it better for you if you’re also having difficulty: https://unilem.org/comment/1447121
🤣🤣🤣 My fuckin’ sides, dude. You are jumping into an argument about language and you don’t even understand the slang use of the word dog. I mean, “what’s up, dog” has been part of the American vernacular for so long that even if you are ESL, it should have permeated through long ago. Here, lemme rephrase that post so you understand the intent better:
“learn some reading comprehension, dog man.”
“learn some reading comprehension, dog dude.”
“learn some reading comprehension, dog friend.”
EDIT: knew you didn’t block me, you big ol’ fibber.
What are you talking about?
Was this guy hanged?
This is the second reply you’ve made that doesn’t make any sense, lol.
OP is making a point that the visibility of queer and other minorities in history and in public is more important than the visibility of straight/non-minority people. Their point was that non-minority groups aren’t hated and target for who they are unlike minority groups. It is important to display and teach about the humanity of different groups in order to prevent mistrust and violence against them by the majorities.
If you really didn’t understand this then you should get your head out of your ass and wake up to reality.
Calm down, no need to resort to personal insults. Rule #1: Be civil.
It seems the guy you’re talking about doesn’t understand my point. Here’s my other post on the matter that can explain it better for you if you’re also having difficulty: https://unilem.org/comment/1447121
No need to be civil with homophobes.
homophobes asking for civility always makes me laugh. You first!
Right.
Gonna have to block you now. You don’t seem to understand what’s going on.
Blocked
Lol. Learn some reading comprehension, dog.
Or just explain your case better? It seems you’re the one who doesn’t understand what I’m saying, based on your other reply.
Lol. Not sure why you’re calling me a ‘dog.’ Let’s leave the personal attacks at home, eh?
My fucking sides 🤣 You are half a goddamn moron, dude.
🤣🤣🤣 My fuckin’ sides, dude. You are jumping into an argument about language and you don’t even understand the slang use of the word dog. I mean, “what’s up, dog” has been part of the American vernacular for so long that even if you are ESL, it should have permeated through long ago. Here, lemme rephrase that post so you understand the intent better:
EDIT: knew you didn’t block me, you big ol’ fibber.