• @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    This seems awful opinionated.

    What does “censorship” mean? The entire purpose of a search engine is to “censor” bad results so I would argue that they all have censorship. And if they don’t they’re probably a bad search engine.

    • @Mane25@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Yes, the term censorship in this context is particularly infuriating to me. It’s not censorship since these are privately owned websites that can link to whatever they like, and users can choose whether or not to use them. When DuckDuckGo launched, before privacy concerns were such a pressing issue the fact that they filtered poor quality sources was one of their most advertised selling points: https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/07/26/26327/the-search-engine-backlash-against-content-mills/

      • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        It’s not censorship since these are privately owned websites that can link to whatever they like

        …what exactly do you think censorship is? Are you under the impression that this is something only the government can do?

        • @Mane25@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Not exactly, no, but a website can’t reasonably be expected to cover everything and that wouldn’t be desirable either.

    • setVeryLoud(true);
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Also the meaning of “censorship” can depend wildly based on your own opinions and political beliefs.

      The correct term to use would have been “Result filtering”, as “censorship” is completely subjective.