These companies paid their employees a median wage of $31,672 in 2022, while their CEOs took home an average $15.3m

  • @SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1212 years ago

    A good reason to have laws regulating the maximum pay gap between executive and the lowest paid peon. And make sure to include all types of pay like stock options so companies can’t squirm out of it.

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      392 years ago

      Sounds great, and sure might as well pass it, but there’s a lot of ways to get around it

      • Shell companies
      • TC in stock/bonuses
      • Outsourcing to contractors
      • Utilizing foreign jurisdictions
      • @PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        45
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ok, let’s do it anyway and make them with fire tag and. Instead of doing nothing, and letting them also do not l nothing to keep their wealth.

        • @whatisallthis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          The point is that if max pay gap laws are passed, CEOs will just hide their actual pay in external resources and normal employees will still make exactly the same.

          • @Shard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Good. Make them hide it. Then make it illegal to hide income(if it already isn’t). Tax agencies like the IRS are really good at catching this sort of thing.

            Make it difficult for them and their companies.

            Make them have to spend to hide it. If they get caught, the money goes back to the economy. If they don’t get caught, at least some the money they spend on law firms and accounts goes back to the economy.

      • @I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Because this is America and if you make rules like that you’ll crush the American Dream tm and no one will want to work at all because you’ve taken away their ability to daydream about one day being the disgustingly rich person doing the trickling instead of the disgustingly poor person waiting to be trickled on.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I’m ok with this, but it’s essentially just a step toward socialism which is the better option (but will never happen). Because all this will do is make CEOs less wealthy from the company itself. The investors still make tons more than the CEOs already and they don’t do anything. You need to force revenue sharing essentially which is just socialism with extra steps. Cause CEOs will just end up investing in other companies and still be wealthy and get less compensation from the company itself.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Exactly. Increasing pay would be really, really nice. But we can do that and have more control over our workplaces. Worker owned companies would prevent huge disparities in pay from reoccurring, regardless of what the government does.

        Like a wise and angry man once said: “Fuck the G rides, I want the machines that are making them.”

      • @Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I don’t think the point is for them to be less wealthy, the point is you shouldn’t make more than 600 times what half your employees make.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I know. But investors don’t care. They’re the root of the problem. CEOs are simply an employee of the company that ultimately represents the shareholders interest. Affecting their pay does not affect shareholder value that much. It just commoditizes the CEO position.

          • @solstice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Seriously, I literally just posted the same comment basically. It’s really silly how fixated on CEOs people are. I guess they are an easy scapegoat example, but they’re just goons hired by the board of directors on behalf of the shareholders. It’s not like they straight up own the company. (Yeah yeah yeah, stock compensation, and Zuck owns 51% of FB etc i know.)

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Socialism is the abolition of social classes. Regulating capital is usually called Social Democracy, or Marxism. Honestly, sieze the means of production.