• @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    952 years ago

    The fact they feel the phrase fuck tankies is acting as a barrier to their participation in 196 should be a wake up call for them to examine their political views.

    Unlike their use of the word liberal, which they use to refer to everyone to the right of them on the political spectrum, we are using the word tankie for a single specific group. Tankie means authoritarian communist. Please keep the sign.

    • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      832 years ago

      I have been called a tankie for supporting Cuba, I have been called a tankie for saying the fall of Rhodesia was a good thing, I have been called a tankie for saying landlord isn’t a legitimate profession, I have been called a tankie for saying Elon Musk doesn’t deserve his wealth. “Tankie” is just “woke”, but for centre left soc-dems

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      Unlike their use of the word liberal, which they use to refer to everyone to the right of them on the political spectrum, we are using the word tankie for a single specific group

      Yes, for everybody to the left of you.

      • @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I am a social democrat. I think we should elect socialist politicians through our existing democracy. The socialist politicians will then vote on legislation to regulate the economy and ensure that corporations do not gain an outsized influence in the free market.

        • build_a_bear_group [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          572 years ago

          Looks at Allende, the Indonesian Genocide, ÖSDAP, and the US Civil War… I am sure, this time the ruling class will just say “aww shucks”, and peacefully give up power, rather than fight to retain power like every previous time.

          • @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Here in the US, the people rule. Since socialist policies are in the interest of the people, they will want to vote for politicians who support socialist policies.

            • jack [he/him, comrade/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              602 years ago

              Here in the US, the people rule.

              This is literally objectively not true:

              https://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-no-longer-democracy

              The US is not, and has never been, a democracy, because the people do not direct the actions of the government except on the margins. There is no democratic input on imperialism or capitalism. Those are invariate, and the system is designed to protect those from public influence.

              • @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                It’s crazy to see a far left news source be used to try to convince people that the US has never been a democracy.

                We have always been a democracy and we thankfully still are a democracy. We are in danger of losing our democracy to fascism however. If we don’t fix the flaws in our democratic institutions we will end up in a fascist dictatorship.

                I am well aware we are circling the fascist drain. I also know that the modern neoliberalism movement started by Regan and Thatcher is how we got here.

                • iie [they/them, he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  132 years ago
                  • 70% of Americans want singlepayer healthcare
                  • 90% want universal background checks for firearm purchases
                  • 75% want Citizen’s United repealed

                  and yet these and other popular policies remain politically impossible

                • Grimble [he/him,they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Ok, you know things. Cool. So why are you being so dodgy about hyperspecific political tendencies? Why is such a precarious, controlled, center-left (by ur standard) system like the US worth balancing?

            • iie [they/them, he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 years ago

              Study: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens:

              From the abstract:

              Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

              further down:

              In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule — at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

              What is it, like, 70% of Americans want single payer healthcare?

            • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The people rule so effectively in the USA that the candidate with less votes has won 1/3 of presidential elections in the 21st century.

              How can you be a “democracy” if the candidate with the most votes loses the election? I thought that was the number one rule of democracy, the person with the most votes wins.

        • SoyViking [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          This has been tried many times and history shows that it’s a really effective way of getting yourself couped and get a brutal reactionary regime put in your place. The bourgeoisie is not burdened by any high-minded liberal ideals when it comes to preserving their wealth and power, they are going to do whatever it takes.

          • Concetta
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            I’m personally more afraid of being drafted in a war started by russia but whatevs

              • Concetta
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                What’s your point? Are russia not currently being an imperialist nation? They are invading a country for the sake of territory

                • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  102 years ago

                  Now, just out of the blue, for no discernable reason, the Russian government decided it would just go ahead and conquer a large population in a land where it would have to fight an insurgency for approximately forever. Yes, this is definitely what’s happening. A tankie might call this pure MSNBC brain, but there is literally nothing else you need to know in order to understand this conflict. Stay strong, and continue to be the smartest person in the room.

                  • Concetta
                    link
                    fedilink
                    22 years ago

                    Ah yes, I’m fully aware that this only began in February 2022 and not a single moment before. There isn’t a history of russia fucking around for the last decade.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      There is no one to the right of authoritarians who want to silence dissent and use violence to right the inequalities in society.

        • Franzia
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          If we were at war and they were soldiers, sure. Otherwise it’s murder.

          • @OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I like this logic. Killing should be a last resort.

            Further, if I had a billion dollars to spend, I’d sooner spend it on organizations like Life After Hate and get them the resources necessary to deconvert and deprogram Nazis than I would on any iteration of our current system of playing whack-a-mole with their censor-evading code words. Or on some Nazi-killing executioner.

            I hate how quick people are to advocate giving up on their fellow humans.