• Log in | Sign up
    link
    fedilink
    English
    620 hours ago

    If guns are so alike to cars, why not require a license that you get by passing a written test on gun safety and a practical test on basic competence and safe usage?

    • @IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      813 hours ago

      They are not alike. It’s a dumb comparison. Transport (albeit flawed) brings many more advantages than shooting people. That’s why people accept cars more than guns.

      • Log in | Sign up
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        I agree it was a dumb comparison to start off with.

        I wasn’t the one who made it, but the license issue is the logical conclusion if OP insists on the comparison.

      • @Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 hours ago

        America has ~280M cars, and ~500M guns

        Americans, at least, are very accepting of guns. There’s a reason the fatality rate is so high

          • @Kickforce@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 hours ago

            I’m a European and in my country driving tests are really hard and it takes a lot of very motivated people 3 or more tries and the better part of a year of frequent training to get a license. When I hear Americans talking about their driving test, most of them didn’t even get on the road and did the test on a separate test terrain. All they need is knowing what a traffic sign is and being nearly able to use their highly automated car. The difference in required knowledge and ability is staggering.

            Add to that the tendency to drive huge and heavy SUV 's and trucks that are highly dangerous to other road users and you get an extremely deadly situation.