edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting
feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)
edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting
feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)
honestly very correct. someone else pointed out that even the worst of us states were only 70/30 maga.
call me a bleeding heart lib but i don’t celebrate the suffering of 10 people just because 7 of them asked for it. 🙃
The ones who voted for it, however…
I adovacte for their survival, recovery, repentance, and penance in proportion to the weight of their crimes.
Sounds reasonable.
That’s what we did after the Civil War, and look where that got us. 🤌🏼
Not even true lol(You were alive immediately after the civil war wow!) Yeah and sadly slave owners literally received reparations when there should have been Nurembergs.Thafuq are you on? Their “crimes” were downplayed and hardly anyone was executed for the endless list of subhuman behavior they only too gleefully perpetrated.
Whose crimes were downplayed?
Slaveholders’ crimes were downplayed and the history of the Confederacy rewritten to appear noble and unrelated to slavery. Some slaveholders were even compensated financially for the freeing of their slaves, while no freed people were compensated, ever.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cause_of_the_Confederacy
Did you skip history class again, son?
No, I wasn’t sure if you were distinguishing between Nuremberg or the slave owners. You write “their” but there are two possible groups that could be applied to, and possibly both. Your message changes based on how I read “their”, so just seeking clarification on what you’re trying to say.
either u are being sarcastic or u 100 degree misinterpreted my comment, we are saying the same thing? /confused
Uhwat.
i guess maybe you were meaning “that’s what we did” as advocating for slaveholder punishment where i interpreted it as actually doing it