DrewM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works • 6 days agoWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square32arrow-up1121
arrow-up1121imageWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzDrewM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works • 6 days agomessage-square32
minus-square@Occultist0178@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink51•6 days agoE = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
minus-square@Little8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish16•6 days agoWhat i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
minus-square@fckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilink8•6 days agoYeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
minus-square@fckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilink8•6 days agoUnfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
minus-square@fckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•6 days agoTrue. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.
E = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
What i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless
So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
Yeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
As long as AI = 0 it works
Unfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
I is 0, as it is nonexistent
True. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.