@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 3 days agoCursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square100arrow-up1844
arrow-up1844imageCursedmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square100
minus-square@Devadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish20•3 days agoAny other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
minus-square@bstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 days agoTry this page if you want to read more about it: https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
minus-square@FelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoThank you, that’s very helpful - unlike cretins downvoting me for asking a question. Upvoted.
minus-square@SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish6•3 days agoThat’s because when you just type “source?” and nothing else people perceive it as you challenging/denying the claim in a slightly hostile manner
minus-square@Klear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish10•edit-23 days agoThankfully the perceived hostility was then dispelled with a followup comment calling people cretins. …wait.
minus-square@Devadander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 days agoSeriously? https://lemmy.world/post/32326900
Any other configurations results in a larger enclosed square. This is the most optimal way to pack 17 squares that we’ve found
Source?
Try this page if you want to read more about it:
https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
Thank you, that’s very helpful - unlike cretins downvoting me for asking a question.
Upvoted.
That’s because when you just type “source?” and nothing else people perceive it as you challenging/denying the claim in a slightly hostile manner
Thankfully the perceived hostility was then dispelled with a followup comment calling people cretins.
…wait.
Bidwell, J. (1997)
In the meme.
Seriously?
https://lemmy.world/post/32326900