ByteOnBikes to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 days agoSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square177arrow-up11.61K
arrow-up11.61KimageSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 days agomessage-square177
minus-square@thespcicifcocean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish56•4 days agoI just woke up, but I don’t think the unit should be percentage per 100k people. Otherwise, I agree with the statement though.
minus-square@Tja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish45•3 days agoNot only that, 07 > 5.7, I assume missing a decimal point. Their heart is in the right place, their keyboard is all over the place.
minus-square@serenissi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish13•3 days agoProbably this person studied in america /j
minus-square@Obi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 days agoYes am I unaware of a strange way of displaying these metrics or did they just add the % sign for no reason?
minus-square@thespcicifcocean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•3 days agoi’m pretty confident (p<0.05) they just added a % for no real reason.
minus-square@squaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 days agoJudging from the rest of the post, the person probably has issues with maths.
minus-squareNielsBohronlinkfedilinkEnglish6•3 days agoYeah, that seemed needlessly confusing to me too.
I just woke up, but I don’t think the unit should be percentage per 100k people. Otherwise, I agree with the statement though.
Not only that, 07 > 5.7, I assume missing a decimal point. Their heart is in the right place, their keyboard is all over the place.
Probably this person studied in america /j
Yes am I unaware of a strange way of displaying these metrics or did they just add the % sign for no reason?
i’m pretty confident (p<0.05) they just added a % for no real reason.
Judging from the rest of the post, the person probably has issues with maths.
Yeah, that seemed needlessly confusing to me too.