@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 12 days agoDots!mander.xyzimagemessage-square94arrow-up1851
arrow-up1851imageDots!mander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 12 days agomessage-square94
minus-square@purplemonkeymad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-211 days agoAccording to your table, it’s not as bad as that, just not a good idea. E: Wait, missread that as thorium.
minus-square@ArtemisimetrA@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•10 days agoThe fact that Thorium and Uranium are just “probably not a good idea” makes me think that the scale is based on licking like an ore that contains them rather than the pure element
minus-square@andros_rex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 days agoI’m pretty sure I could get away with licking my uranium ore sample. Not going to test it apropos of nothing though. A lot of those trans-uranium (and astatine) aren’t going to exist in lick-able quantities anyway.
According to your table, it’s not as bad as that, just not a good idea. E: Wait, missread that as thorium.
The fact that Thorium and Uranium are just “probably not a good idea” makes me think that the scale is based on licking like an ore that contains them rather than the pure element
I’m pretty sure I could get away with licking my uranium ore sample. Not going to test it apropos of nothing though.
A lot of those trans-uranium (and astatine) aren’t going to exist in lick-able quantities anyway.