@Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-217 days agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-square159arrow-up1630
arrow-up1630message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.@Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-217 days agomessage-square159
minus-square@M0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilink6•15 days agoAnd dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
minus-square@masterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish1•14 days agoNo, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way. Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
minus-square@M0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilink1•14 days agoWell in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.
And dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
No, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way.
Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
Well in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.