• Guy Ingonito
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2613 hours ago

    I remember this was literally the question posed to us by an ethics professor 20 years ago. Now it’s a reality.

    A person with Down’s can live a happy fulfilling life, but most parents would never choose to have a child with Down’s if it could be born ‘normal’ instead. So we’re essentially removing them from the gene pool and human race.

    It’s eugenics for sure. I’m not sure if it’s unethical though. It’s pretty complex.

    • @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 hours ago

      The one thing you can guarantee of the human race though is we will do it before we really put the thought in to “if” we should do it.

      I have ADHD and have 2 boys on the spectrum. Despite the challenges with my younger and higher needs son I don’t know if given the opportunity to play God if I would. As you said it’s an extremely complex question I don’t know if anyone is truly equipped to answer and I’d argue we definitely aren’t mature enough to start playing God.

      Here be dragons.

    • @bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2612 hours ago

      we’re essentially removing them from the gene pool

      I don’t think Downs works like that.

      It’s already being removed, since people choose abortion over downs and since people with Downs don’t have children (normally).

      It is not hereditary. It’s an error or mutation that can occur for anyone. The chances are higher the older the parents are.

    • @meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      712 hours ago

      My understanding is that women with down syndrome only have a 30-50% chance of fertility, and men are generally infertile. Additionally there are laws in place to prevent those with mental disabilities from being taken advantage of sexually, which lessens the chance of children even more. It’s a spontaneous mutation, so they wouldn’t be removed from the gene pool.

      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6603116/

      • Guy Ingonito
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 hours ago

        If 99℅ of pregnancies are screened and the gene’s edited then, yeah, you’re effectively eliminating people with Down’s from our world.

        Unless society collapses and the Quirk returns naturally.

    • @Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Reminds me of Cyprus with Thalassemia,

      they were mostly against termination, but when they introduced screenings, and optional termination. the disease mysteriously disappeared. even though publicly they were against it

      (it’s a story I read about it a long time ago, so take it with a grain of sand)