@HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 18 days agoWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square53arrow-up1114file-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1114imageWhy make it complicated?lemmy.ml@HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 18 days agomessage-square53file-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-square@ByteWelder@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish5•17 days agoIn Kotlin, you can have the type become implicit with the former syntax: let text = number.toString() (text is a String here)
minus-square𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍linkfedilink3•edit-217 days agoYou can also do that in TypeScript readonly a!: Foo; readonly b = bar.toFoo(); constructor(){ a = bar.toFoo(); }
In Kotlin, you can have the type become implicit with the former syntax:
let text = number.toString()(textis aStringhere)You can also do that in TypeScript
readonly a!: Foo; readonly b = bar.toFoo(); constructor(){ a = bar.toFoo(); }