@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-24 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square445arrow-up11.25Kcross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlinepolitics@lemmy.worldtodayilearned@lemmit.online
arrow-up11.25Kexternal-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.com@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-24 days agomessage-square445cross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlinepolitics@lemmy.worldtodayilearned@lemmit.online
minus-square@WraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 days agoWell… ok… then let’s do the “NONVIOLENT” protests and stop doing these sit ins.
minus-square@M0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilink2•19 hours agoLooks like it. So cherry picking from both ends on this one.
What about the arab spring?
They consider it non-violent.
Well… ok… then let’s do the “NONVIOLENT” protests and stop doing these sit ins.
I mean do they consider it a success?
Looks like it. So cherry picking from both ends on this one.