• @SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    226 days ago

    Is it normal to allow people to send military information to your enemy?

    I’m not a huge fan of either of the two belligerent, but this is not exactly an unreasonable position to take. And they are at least putting reporters on notice.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      96 days ago

      I mean if they really just wanted to make sure military information doesn’t reach Israel they wouldn’t impose the death penalty; the excessive punishment makes it clear this is going to be used to suppress unrelated dissent.

      • @SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 days ago

        Information flow can never go backwards. There’s plenty of examples of reporters or even social media compromising military operations. In at least a few cases, it has lead to the destruction of military assets. Once broadcast, the damage is done.

        Trying to force reporters to think hard about what they are broadcasting is a good thing, from the point of view of national defence.

    • @belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 days ago

      “hey, so if we think you published classified info, you’re gonna get killed. Is that okay with you guys? Thanks for being so understanding.”

    • @Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 days ago

      If it’s a dictatorship I’d say yes because they are (also) the enemy.

      I’m also against the death penalty in general, but especially for scaring your own citizens into obedience.

      • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 days ago

        Yeah, apparently murder is supposed to be used for scaring foreign citizens into obedience, based on what liberals say