@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-225 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square446arrow-up11.26Kcross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlinepolitics@lemmy.worldtodayilearned@lemmit.online
arrow-up11.26Kexternal-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.com@MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world • edit-225 days agomessage-square446cross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlinepolitics@lemmy.worldtodayilearned@lemmit.online
minus-square@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink37•25 days agoPeaceful protest works great under two conditions: Just a metric fuckton of participants The implicit threat of violent protest (e.g. Malcom X behind MLK)
minus-square@tamal3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•24 days agoMeaning they aren’t somehow making money off whatever you’re protesting…
Peaceful protest works great under two conditions:
Just a metric fuckton of participants
The implicit threat of violent protest (e.g. Malcom X behind MLK)
Meaning they aren’t somehow making money off whatever you’re protesting…