• @Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      People get proccupied with emulating YT, which is indeed cost prohibitive. But that response assumes one is emulating all of it. What about only pursuing sections of it to cater to particular audiences? Serving 100% of YT’s video might be too much even for Amazon (for example) but what about 1%?

      Why couldn’t Amazon host Booktube? And the manga/anime enthusiasts and other varietes of weebs to go along with them? They already own ebook retail. A VOD service to chip off some of YT’s viewership would be a more productive investment than The Rings of Power…

      A YT competitor needs a bit of scale, sure, but not as much as YT itself. A fraction will do.

    • @amorangi@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3414 hours ago

      By operating youtube at a loss for many years Google acted anticompetitively to kill competition or stop competition arising. Now that they’ve achieved that they can do what they like. Don’t feel bad using ad blockers against this anti-capitalist company.

      • @atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        I never felt bad abt that for a second. Like the thought never crossed my kind XD FUCK YOUTUBE!

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 hours ago

          And suppression of comments, for all sorts of reasons. Words and phrases will constantly flag AI autoremoval.

      • Anas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        612 hours ago

        I am in no way defending YouTube here, but how did it act anticompetitively?

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Hosting and storage costs, few can afford to be an alternative to an absolutely gigantic video storage platform that costs obscene money to maintain.

      • That Weird Vegan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 minutes ago

        I am causing a netloss to googs. I don’t pay for Google plus or whatever, and j don’t view their fucking ads. Win win if you ask me.

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Sure, a service that manages an infinitely smaller amount of content and complexity. It is a situational tool, hardly a YouTube killer… the banner presented on the homepage professes that it’s expensive to run and please donate.

    • @GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 hours ago

      OK, so a bittorrent tracker site with a video player built in with comments underneath and you can get perks from content creators for seeding. Then of course some kind of voting system and etc. Then a creator can just get a seed box to start hosting their own videos.

      • @atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        614 hours ago

        You’re right :)

        I meant idk something like Oddysse (but a website with actual moderation)

        • @ewenak@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Do you know of PeerTube? It’s not mainstream at all either, but it seems more known to me.

          It’s also in the fediverse, and isn’t accused of the same moderation issues (though idk if PeerTube is really better than Odyssee at moderation, I suppose it’s just a difference in policy).

          Edit: I read a bit about it, and I can see I was wrong about Odyssee being less known than PeerTube. It’s strange, I never heard of it, but anyway. Odyssee also includes some crypto bullshit, so yeah…