Why is everyone jumping to the psychopath narrative? Is there background on this guy? Why bring up crying children? This feels like a Phy Op to me and some people replying in this post are glowing a bit…
Edit: Finally after everyone spent all day being mad at me for asking for information, one of you got me some. Thanks alekwithak!
Ah, so now we have to figure out if there was intent kill let alone intent to brutally kill. I think this thread is where I am having this discussion , but let me know if you think it is too far off and want to start your own.
He accidentally grabbed the bird’s legs, accidentally hulk-smashed it into a wall, accidentally got its blood on his chips, which he accidentally ate while smirking.
Because killing animals, especially over petty shit, and especially especially in front of others while disregarding their reactions isliterally psychopath shit. Your insistence that this is some kind of ‘Phy Op’ just makes you look like one, too.
Edit: and to call people out for ‘glowing’ is not helping your case, either.
This is what I have been asking for all day. Your the first person to provide me with some actual information. Thanks! After seeing this, I think the person did intend to kill the seagull. I don’t know if it rises to psychopathy, but everyone else’s reactions seem to make more sense now.
Wtf is this argument? Swinging things applies other forces besides your own power and speed, and since you brought up those two forces you must realize there’s a minimum of both that must be applied in order to swing an object properly and you’d also know full well as Newton’s third law of motion dictates that when said swinging object meets the object at rest that the sum of those forces will be exerted back onto the swinging object. Every choice made equals bird death. He didn’t flick it on the nose, he didn’t show it up slightly, he didn’t swing it into some software brush or a beach ball or an elastic fence, he swung it into a brick wall. A + B = C. Anything else is just conjecture on your end, made in some vain attempt to justify brutish thuggery just because the victim was an animal you don’t respect.
Try it yourself. Get about two feet of rope or something. Tie an egg to the end. See exactly how much speed and power you have to use to get it to properly swing. Then swing it into a brick wall and try not to break the egg.
Make sure to film the attempt, I’d love to see it.
Whoa, hold on, I just finally got new information. The information I have been asking for all day. I now believe they killed the bird intentionally. Did you have that link? If, so, why didn’t you send it to me?
Imagine making a mistake, it couldn’t be this guy — this guy only takes W’s and can perfectly control his body. Down to his fucking heart rate like Hannibal, wow — us lowly mortals will never compare to the guy with volume sliders on his muscles.
What is happening right now? Are you writing a book? Is this roll play?
You know, if you have some information or an augment against my point. You can just say it. Wrapping it in sarcasm or whatever that last post was, doesn’t help me and others understand what you are getting at. Also, it doesn’t make you look very good.
Look, man. I just talked to Chris Brown. He told me you will be sanctioned and put into the bonk-pit for 21 days for being a bird lover. That is, unless you can post a video of you bonking a bird right now to prove you aren’t a traitor to our cause.
Why is everyone jumping to the psychopath narrative? Is there background on this guy? Why bring up crying children? This feels like a Phy Op to me and some people replying in this post are glowing a bit…
Edit: Finally after everyone spent all day being mad at me for asking for information, one of you got me some. Thanks alekwithak!
Yeah, because killing a huge fucking seagull in front of kids is a totally normal thing to do.
So all not normal things are psychotic?
No but brutally killing an animal in public in front of children is.
They should have brought it home and killed it in private like a civilized person.
Ah, so now we have to figure out if there was intent kill let alone intent to brutally kill. I think this thread is where I am having this discussion , but let me know if you think it is too far off and want to start your own.
Tbh, I don’t care what the “intent” was. Swinging an animal by its feet into a wall because it stole your chips is an entirely inappropriate response.
Like if you kicked a dog in the head because it peed in your lawn. It’s a disgusting and very much non-proportional response.
Ok, to be clear. Your argument is that accidently killing a bird makes you a psychopath. Do I have that right?
Yeah! Like that!
He accidentally grabbed the bird’s legs, accidentally hulk-smashed it into a wall, accidentally got its blood on his chips, which he accidentally ate while smirking.
You’re winning, keep talking!
Wait, I didn’t know he hulk-smashed it. Where is that piece of information? Is there like a video of it?
Please there must be something I am missing, otherwise a lot of people on this post are just idiots. And that can’t be right.
The moral highground is an addictive drug. People are desperate for it.
Because killing animals, especially over petty shit, and especially especially in front of others while disregarding their reactions is literally psychopath shit. Your insistence that this is some kind of ‘Phy Op’ just makes you look like one, too. Edit: and to call people out for ‘glowing’ is not helping your case, either.
How do we know they intended to kill the bird and not give it a light bonk? Where did you see he disregarded their reactions?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5969923/amp/Pensioner-KILLS-seagull-grabbing-feet-swinging-wall-stole-chip.html
Sounds like a great guy. He’s lucky to have you here defending him for some reason.
This is what I have been asking for all day. Your the first person to provide me with some actual information. Thanks! After seeing this, I think the person did intend to kill the seagull. I don’t know if it rises to psychopathy, but everyone else’s reactions seem to make more sense now.
Have you simply never used your hands to do anything before? Or maybe you were born without hands?
I’m just wondering how a human reaches adulthood without understanding what will happen when you nunchuk a seagull into a wall.
So your implying he used full force? How do you know that, is there a video?
So you’ve never used your hands to do anything before, got it.
Are you AI? This is a level of not understanding human strength that seems very ‘I am not human’.
Wait so you’re saying everything you do is full force?
In my experience I can adjust the power and speed I use to do things. This must be blowing your mind.
I’m reading all your comments in the voice of John Mulaney
Wtf is this argument? Swinging things applies other forces besides your own power and speed, and since you brought up those two forces you must realize there’s a minimum of both that must be applied in order to swing an object properly and you’d also know full well as Newton’s third law of motion dictates that when said swinging object meets the object at rest that the sum of those forces will be exerted back onto the swinging object. Every choice made equals bird death. He didn’t flick it on the nose, he didn’t show it up slightly, he didn’t swing it into some software brush or a beach ball or an elastic fence, he swung it into a brick wall. A + B = C. Anything else is just conjecture on your end, made in some vain attempt to justify brutish thuggery just because the victim was an animal you don’t respect.
Try it yourself. Get about two feet of rope or something. Tie an egg to the end. See exactly how much speed and power you have to use to get it to properly swing. Then swing it into a brick wall and try not to break the egg. Make sure to film the attempt, I’d love to see it.
Whoa, hold on, I just finally got new information. The information I have been asking for all day. I now believe they killed the bird intentionally. Did you have that link? If, so, why didn’t you send it to me?
Imagine making a mistake, it couldn’t be this guy — this guy only takes W’s and can perfectly control his body. Down to his fucking heart rate like Hannibal, wow — us lowly mortals will never compare to the guy with volume sliders on his muscles.
Whoa, sorry, I didn’t mean to sound ableist. I make mistakes with my muscle control as much as the next person does.
I’ve given light bonks to my wife before. It’s a shame the judge won’t see reason.
Thanks for self reporting your spousal abuse I guess.
Hey! You’re supposed to be on our side!
The wife-beater bird-beater consortium will hear about this.
What is happening right now? Are you writing a book? Is this roll play?
You know, if you have some information or an augment against my point. You can just say it. Wrapping it in sarcasm or whatever that last post was, doesn’t help me and others understand what you are getting at. Also, it doesn’t make you look very good.
Look, man. I just talked to Chris Brown. He told me you will be sanctioned and put into the bonk-pit for 21 days for being a bird lover. That is, unless you can post a video of you bonking a bird right now to prove you aren’t a traitor to our cause.
You can email it to wife.keeps.stealing.my.chips@birdwatchers.com
I guess the important thing is that you’re having fun.