He stressed that protests were “nowhere near” the level required to deploy the troops.

Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell sharply countered Donald Trump’s claims that the city needed National Guard support, emphasizing Wednesday that protests were “nowhere near” that level.

McDonnell’s remarks come after Trump cited the police chief as validating the White House’s decision to send in troops to address largely peaceful protests over immigration raids.

When asked by CNN’s Kaitlan Collins if Trump had correctly described his position, McDonnell disputed the president’s statement.

“No, we were not in a position to request the National Guard,” he said. “We’re nowhere near a level where we would be reaching out to the governor for National Guard at this stage. And my hope is that things are going in the right direction now and that we wouldn’t have had to have done that, or we won’t either.”

  • @Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    672 days ago

    On one hand I’m glad he announced this, but he also needs to address the gross incompetence going on within his police force as well. The world is watching and his officers are shooting fucking journalists with rubber bullets. Some sort of statement showing he’s aware and that disciplinary action is being pursued would be a start.

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      142 days ago

      Did anything even happen to the cop that shot that journalist? Seems like everyone just accepted this instead of bringing charges or vigilanteism

      • BeBopALouie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 days ago

        I doubt anything has happened or will happen. In Florida today they’re now saying it’s OK to run over protesters. Hopefully, they run over the magats instead.

    • Noxy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 days ago

      please, I beg of you, understand that it is so, so, so much worse than incompetence.

      how can you see that officer raise his gun and fire at that journalist while she was on camera, to the point where he obviously had absolutely nothing at all going on around him, and wildly understate that as “gross incompetence”?

      • @Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        No you’re right I should have used different phrasing. It’s not incompetence it’s straight up just being a piece of shit.

      • @Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        Yeah you’re right. Gross incompetence would imply fault due to lack of training or ability to perform the job. The reality would be more just failure to be a fucking human being. I should have phrased that better.

    • @Birdie@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      72 days ago

      And that woman they beat with batons, and deliberately trampled with a horse… That behavior is unacceptable, that is criminal behavior. Those are actions taken by criminals, and they need to be identified, arrested and taken to trial.

      Thankfully someone was filming from above them so that there is a record.