@0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 9 days agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square90arrow-up1878
arrow-up1878imagerace conditionslemmy.zip@0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 9 days agomessage-square90
minus-squarelime!linkfedilinkEnglish19•9 days agoonly true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
minus-square@ouRKaoS@lemmy.todaylinkfedilink5•9 days agoI’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
minus-square@ratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilink2•8 days agoI thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
minus-squarelime!linkfedilinkEnglish2•8 days agoonly if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
minus-square@ratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilink1•8 days agoAh ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoFortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
only true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
I’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
I thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
only if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
Ah ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
yeah but rednax wasn’t.
Fortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.