@weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world • 1 month agoMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square25arrow-up1702
arrow-up1702imageMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.social@weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square25
minus-square@Empricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoDo you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
minus-square@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•1 month agomakes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
minus-square@sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink5•1 month agoBut that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?
Do you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
makes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
But that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?