• @Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    288 days ago

    Recently, saw some survey that explicitly said 1-7 is “poor”, 7-8 is “OK”, and 9-10 is “great”. Wild, not sure what the point of the scale is then.

    Same with book ratings. Looking at StoryGraph, the average ratings I see is somewhere between 3.5 and 4.5. While I would rate a decent book a 3.

    Born in Eastern Europe, live in the US, maybe that’s why.

    • @0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 days ago

      I wonder if it’s like the grading system we use in school? <60% is F for fail, 60% to <70% is D which depending on the class can be barely passing or barely failing. >=70% would be A, B, and C grades which are all usually passing, and A in particular means doing extremely well or perfect (>=90%). I just noticed that that rating scale kind of lines up with the typical American grading scale, maybe that’s just a coincidence

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 days ago

        most countries i know mark <50% as a failing grade

        • Lovable Sidekick
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Apples and watermelons. The all-time highest major league batting average is only .371, nowhere near .500 which would correspond to 50% of the max possible.

          • lime!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 days ago

            i have no idea what that means or why it’s relevant.

            • Lovable Sidekick
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I believe you. On a rating scale of 0-10 a value of 5 doesn’t usually represent a failure or anything negative, it’s usually a middle concept such as “neither like nor dislike”. Batting average is another example where 50% isn’t a “failing grade”. Hope that helps clear it up for you.

              • lime!
                link
                fedilink
                English
                67 days ago

                no i mean i don’t know what a “batting average” is or why it’s apples to oranges to compare it to test scores.

                i’m assuming you mean that comparing a pure gaussian distribution to a weighted system is unproductive?