• bitofarambler
    link
    fedilink
    221 days ago

    The decades-long occupation pretty much never works and just engenders more revolution, so I wouldn’t recommend that route.

    also, the “violent religious reactionaries” is a bit of a leap from the sheer volume of detainees.

    I think the violent ones should be dealt with much differently than the non-violent activists, but they are apparently treated the same.

      • bitofarambler
        link
        fedilink
        120 days ago

        absolute minimum is around half a million detainee in total (ccp numbers until 2019), and most outside estimates place the number closer to 1-2 million uyghur detainees.

        Bear in mind that this is not some static equation, mass detainment started almost 10 years ago at this point and has been occurring for a decade. with detainment ongoing and the CCP long having stopped sharing specific information, it’s going to be hard to get specific numbers past 2019(the half a million number) for years to come.

    • KuroXppi [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The decades-long occupatio

      Wdym occupation. Xinjiang (formerly Xiyu) has been incorporated territory of the PRC since its foundation, and part of China since (conservatively) the Tang dynasty.

      Edit: i misunderstood the comment

    • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      420 days ago

      Ok, so the violent religious reactionaries needed to be dealt with, but with a more nuanced approach. What should it be? What would be faster and gentler, but also effective?