Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

@dwazou@lemm.ee · edit-2 29 days ago

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

@lowleekun@ani.social · 28 days ago

Even if it wasn’t an unhealthy diet it is egoistic as fuck.

@jet@hackertalks.com · 27 days ago

Why is a eating pattern egoistic?

@lowleekun@ani.social · 27 days ago

Because its take huge amounts of land and is cruel to animals.

NSRXN · 27 days ago

eating meat isn’t cruel

@lowleekun@ani.social · 26 days ago

Killing animals without need seems cruel enough to me. You are honestly going to tell me we treat animals the way they deserve? Especially on affordable meat?

NSRXN · 26 days ago

first of all, I don’t kill animals, except pests or by accident.

second, how can animals deserve… anything?

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

Industry study sponsorship and conflicts of interest on the effect of unprocessed red meat on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review of clinical trials - PubMed