@dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-229 days agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square107arrow-up1596
arrow-up1596external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov@dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-229 days agomessage-square107
minus-square@merrickal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•29 days agoStrange that YTubers have to announce if they’re a sponsored video but sponsored scientists don’t.
minus-square@SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish21•edit-229 days agoRead the end of any research paper and it indicates any possible conflicts of interest. Youtube isn’t a reliable source.
minus-square@entwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish20•edit-229 days agoThey usually disclose their funding in the journal article. Otherwise, this meta analysis wouldn’t be possible.
Strange that YTubers have to announce if they’re a sponsored video but sponsored scientists don’t.
Read the end of any research paper and it indicates any possible conflicts of interest. Youtube isn’t a reliable source.
They usually disclose their funding in the journal article. Otherwise, this meta analysis wouldn’t be possible.