@Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 1 month agoTrump Rages At Walmart For Raising Prices Over Tariffswww.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square175arrow-up1753
arrow-up1753external-linkTrump Rages At Walmart For Raising Prices Over Tariffswww.mediaite.com@Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square175
minus-square@Don_alForno@feddit.orglinkfedilink12•1 month agoIt’s an element of a planned economy which has been more commonly used in authoritarian socialist countries but isn’t exclusive to them. (Fun fact because I just looked it up: There doesn’t seem to be one generally accepted definition of “socialism”.)
minus-squarezqpslinkfedilink3•1 month agoWorker ownership of the means of production. I.e. profits from goods and services go to those who provide them rather than investors.
minus-square@Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoWhich is why I scream about employee ownership whenever I can. It’s the closest we can get in the states I think right now. NCEO
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink2•edit-21 month agoSocial ownership (public) of production, doesn’t have to be the workers State capitalism exists though, ROK and CCP are the more famous examples
minus-square@Don_alForno@feddit.orglinkfedilink1•1 month agoThat’s communism. The two are not interchangeable.
minus-squarezqpslinkfedilink2•edit-21 month agoNo it’s not. Socialism is compatible with economic and political systems beyond communism. Sorry, but you don’t know what you are talking about.
minus-square@CheeseNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoI’d say a good loose definition is just ‘people pooling resources for the common good’ so basically all taxes and things paid for by taxes including the military.
It’s an element of a planned economy which has been more commonly used in authoritarian socialist countries but isn’t exclusive to them.
(Fun fact because I just looked it up: There doesn’t seem to be one generally accepted definition of “socialism”.)
Worker ownership of the means of production.
I.e. profits from goods and services go to those who provide them rather than investors.
Which is why I scream about employee ownership whenever I can. It’s the closest we can get in the states I think right now. NCEO
Social ownership (public) of production, doesn’t have to be the workers
State capitalism exists though, ROK and CCP are the more famous examples
That’s communism. The two are not interchangeable.
No it’s not. Socialism is compatible with economic and political systems beyond communism. Sorry, but you don’t know what you are talking about.
I’d say a good loose definition is just ‘people pooling resources for the common good’ so basically all taxes and things paid for by taxes including the military.