@einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 months agoultimate storage hacksh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square91arrow-up1907
arrow-up1907imageultimate storage hacksh.itjust.works@einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 months agomessage-square91
minus-squareBrahvim BhaktvatsallinkfedilinkisiZulu1•edit-22 months ago…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default FILENAME_MAX on Linux/glibc 4096?
minus-square@barsoap@lemm.eelinkfedilink2•2 months agoBecause PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page. FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
minus-squareBrahvim BhaktvatsallinkfedilinkisiZulu1•2 months agoThanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.
…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default
FILENAME_MAX
on Linux/glibc4096
?Because PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page.
FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
Thanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.