Over 100 Israelis have died and more than 900 were injured after rockets were fired from Gaza by Hamas militants, Israeli officials said Saturday.

The Palestinian Health Ministry said 198 were killed in Gaza and at least 1,610 were injured Saturday in retaliatory attacks from Israel.

“We are at war. We will win,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday.

The Israeli Defense Forces earlier declared “a state of alert for war,” according to a statement issued by the IDF.

“Over the past hour, the Hamas terrorist organization launched massive barrages of rockets from Gaza into Israel, and its terrorist operatives have infiltrated into Israel in a number of different locations in the south,” the IDF said early Saturday.

  • @kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2432 years ago

    This is awful, and there are no good sides to it. Hamas are terrorists, and the Israeli government’s actions have made this kind of thing inevitable.

    A lot of innocent people on both sides will die, nothing will get resolved, and both sides will continue to do horrible things to each other.

    This sucks.

    • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      782 years ago

      Is there a way that a nation can use the same means as their oppressor to resist apartheid and not be labeled as “terrorist”?

      • @kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        982 years ago

        You’re missing the point. Hamas brutally oppresses its own people, as does Israel’s goverment. This is a predictably violent response from a violent group in retaliation against another violent group, and innocent people in both countries who just want to live their lives will suffer for it.

        There are no good guys here. Israel is ultimately at fault for its treatment of Palestine, but that doesn’t excuse Hamas tactics of executing civilians in their homes - tactics that will not work and will not bring anyone to their side.

        This is going to be a long, shitty time for a lot of people and nothing will be solved. And that fucking sucks.

      • V H
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No. It will invariably be called terrorism.

        ANC carried out terror bombings intentionally targeting civilians too after first trying non-violent protests, then trying sabotage, then targeting military, and not getting results. And they were called terrorists as well despite certainly doing far less harm than the regime they fought, and ignoring that while civilian, the majority of their victims were voters who had an active role in continuing to vote in the regimes engaged in the oppression.

        The only way to stop being labeled terrorist is to win the conflict, like the ANC.

        This is not a criticism of the ANC, btw… On a personal level I think some of their actions were deplorable, but I also think that it is fundamentally not up to any of us to judge the armed resistance of the oppressed unless we are actively fighting that oppression in better, more effective ways.

        In other words: Personally, I think that anyone who is not personally at a minimum engaged in efforts to end Israeli oppression that is likely to right now be achieving more than armed Palestinian resistance has no moral standing to judge their actions.

        And nobody here is.

        • @maporita@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          The ANC won by mobilizing world opinion against the South African regime. The armed struggle was inconsequential and contributed nothing to ending apartheid.

          • V H
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Mandela disagreed with you, and maintained to the end that it was essential in mobilizing support. They got little attention until they ramped up.

            The engaged in non-violent resistance against increasingly oppressive laws for decades with no support or attention, and achieving nothing. In fact Apartheid was put in place during, not before, that non-violent resistance, that was how little it achieved. The sanctions first started after ANC and others raised the stakes and violence started rattling the regime into escalation that caught attention.

            However, whether or not it was effective is irrelevant to the argument I made, which is that unless you provide a better solution, you’re not in a position to judge how they fight back.

      • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        The Resistance Française would’ve been labelled “terrorists” by the current standards.

      • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

        “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

        To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

        The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

        Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

        This isn’t good-faith criticism.

        These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

    • @Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Iranian goverment is celebrating the attack they backed.

      Thousands will die from their weapons. Thousands more will be permanently disfigured or injured. Hamas put their HQ right in downtown, so when it got predictably destroyed, it hurt a bunch of civilians.

      Not surprising since the Saudis and Israel were finally starting to make up, which Iran hates. But sad nonetheless. I hope the Israelis and Palestinians can come to an agreement, and that Iran gets a better, more peaceful government. But I doubt it.

      • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

        “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

        To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

        The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

        Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

        This isn’t good-faith criticism.

        These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

  • halfempty
    link
    fedilink
    1692 years ago

    No good guys here. Hamas doesn’t seem to serve the Palestinians, they serve their own Jihadist agenda. Isreal remains a fascist apartheid regime which has been systematically killing all Palestinians in a genocide for decades.

        • @selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          Gaza is a massive prison and they don’t have anything to loose anymore. Will Israel become the exterminator? We will see.

      • @vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        Murder of civilians celebrated by the whole of their society is not justified by reaction. I suggest you look at some other societies which react to genocidal crimes, for some reference. Most of them don’t do that.

        Nah, this was the case with Palestinian Arabs all along. Since their “throw all Jews into the sea” till now.

        • V H
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          ANC bombed civilians and their attacks were celebrated by many. The IRA did, and were celebrated by many. ETA did, and were celebrated by many. It is common, and suggesting it’s unique to Palestinians is pure racism.

          EDIT: Ah, looked at one of your other comments that were equally awful. Block incoming.

          • @vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            I don’t think you know the difference between collateral damage and massacre. Or maybe you know that, just pretend to be a moron. I can accept your pretense, but not your point.

            • @drstrange@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Are you suggesting it is not true that the groups he mentioned intentionally targeted civilians?

              Perhaps you’re not old enough to remember the ANC bombing campaign against Wimpy restaurants, mainly timed to go off during lunchtime to maximise damage.

              The Church Street bombing it’s reasonable to argue collateral damage for, but a burger chain doesn’t strike me as a legitimate military or government target you can play the “collateral damage” game with.

              Maybe it was just ignorance of history that made you single out Palestinians.

              • @vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                OK. I don’t think IRA and ANC had that nasty habit of raping their victims and parading their mutilated bodies, or lynching them, and in general these were not genocidal in ideology while Hamas is. Is that sufficiently clear for you to comprehend?

                FFS, I’m Armenian and I could give Israel another try at existing after turning it into radioactive ash, but defending these animals is just vile.

                • @drstrange@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  And now you’re making an entirely different point and evading addressing the gross generalization you made where you blamed not just Hamas but all Palestinians for the crimes of some and implied they were uniquely bad. At this point I agree with the other person who blocked you.

      • @homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        472 years ago

        There is only one country whose national religion is Judaism, but it is practiced in plenty of other places.

        More to the point, the fact that there are other Islamic countries is of little comfort to the Palestinians. They do not live in those countries and those countries do not want them.

        Some of those countries do provide varying levels of support for Hamas because they (accurately) see it as an indirect way to attack Israel.

        By the same token, any blame you want to place on Israel for this conflict reflects on Isreal as whole, and not every individual living within it.

        • Anduin1357
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          The whole reason why other Islamic (Arab) countries don’t accept Palestinians is so that they retain their “rightful” claim to lands annexed by Israel from the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

          The Palestinians did it to themselves that they couldn’t live peacefully with the Israelis back then and should accept the outcome of the war as a failing of the Arab League and their resistance.

          Besides, you can’t deny that the Arab world owes some debt to the Palestinians to accept their refuge since it was the Arab League that lost all those attempts to retake Palestinian lands (amongst other things), and yet they don’t do it.

          The religious aspect of all this is just secondary to the secular reason.

            • V H
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 years ago

              You realise just how racist it sounds when you’re blaming the Palestinian people as a whole for the actions of a subset?

                • V H
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Do you have evidence that a huge majority wants to take over states if they are invited in, which was the claim you were making?

                  To quote you:

                  The whole reason they don’t take Palestinians in is because Palestinians try to take their country over.

                  It happened in Jordan, it happened in Lebanon. It will happen anywhere they are allowed to congregate.

                  This is full on far-right “if you let those immigrants in they’ll take over” rhetoric.

                  EDIT: I’d also like to point out, that in fact this notion of a people coming in and trying to “take over” ironically given the context here has a long-standing history as an anti-semitic trope when used against Jewish people. It’s no less of a racist trope when employed against other groups, though.

      • V H
        link
        fedilink
        English
        442 years ago

        Treating all muslims as if they’re all the same and interchangeable is pure racism.

        • @Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Well by another definition they all have the same core religious view. Just as any other religion that perpetuates collective hysteria and war. Humanity is better without any kind of organized dogma. Let’s jettison the stone age thinking.

          • V H
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            If all they did was argue for jettisoning stone age thinking, I’d have been all for that. But instead the person I replied to engaged in just another variant of the same stone age thinking.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        So they should give up their homes, land, resources, and culture for the last gasp of colonialism?

              • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                There’s a hundred countries they can both live in without problems. There is no amount of past trauma that justifies ethnic cleansing for literal settlers to move in.

                • @SwampYankee@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  52 years ago

                  As a Jew, no, there is no country in the world I can live in without problems, including Israel. America has been wonderful to us, but I grew up seeing swastikas spray painted on my synagogue and being taunted by the goyim. A far cry from the persecution my ancestors have endured, but I don’t delude myself into thinking I’m safe here if the economic/political situation deteriorates.

          • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            As somebody else pointed out, reducing the people in Palestine to Muslims and they treating all people who happen to be muslims as if they’re as the same, is pure unadulterated racism of the worst, most disgusting, kind.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        How does it feel to be the exact caricature Hamas shows the children of slaughtered families for recruitment?

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Hamas gave being legitimate a try. Israel blocked their accession in the West Bank after they won the election. They were never given a chance to serve Palestinians.

      • @trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        I wouldn’t really expect them to idly stand by and let an organization whose charter is essentially “Death to Israel, death to all Jews” to come into power

        There cannot be a peaceful coexistence between Israel and Hamas because (and their charter has a section explicitly devoted to this) Hamas does not want it, when they talk of “ending the occupation”, they don’t just mean of Palestine

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Funny thing. If we used that logic then we’d all be dead. No war would ever end but with the complete annihilation of the loser and with nukes that means everyone.

          Furthermore, PR line or not, Hamas was elected. Interfering to stop them from taking power is an act of war itself. Justify it how you want but Israel hasn’t given peace a chance in a long time.

          • @trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            When one side very explicitly states “there will be no peace, we will keep fighting until one of us is completely wiped out”, I struggle to see why the world should not oblige, and while the state of Israel is definitely not perfect it’s not very difficult for me lean towards the side that’s still managing to perform roof knocking over the complete and utter barbarism displayed by the Hamas terrorists over the fast few days

  • @randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 years ago

    There was a joke on Rick and Morty that Rick got the Palestinians and the Israelis to sign the treaty of “peace plan that works if you think about it a bit”.

    I am sure every commenter has one of those plans in their back pocket that would work if implemented. The problem is there is no incentive. In Palestinine, Hamas grows stronger the more Palestinians hate Isreal, and their opposition grows stronger the more Palestinians want peace. Meanwhile Likud grows stronger the more Israelis hate Palestinians, and the opposition grows stronger when Israelis want peace. Why would either side implement something that would decrease their power?

    • @Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      The sad thing is that the people dying for this usually aren’t anywhere remotely near the level of the people that have power to lose or keep. Dying for the sake of rich assholes all the way down

    • @Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      The problem is there is no incentive. In Palestinine, Hamas grows stronger the more Palestinians hate Isreal, and their opposition grows stronger the more Palestinians want peace. Meanwhile Likud grows stronger the more Israelis hate Palestinians, and the opposition grows stronger when Israelis want peace. Why would either side implement something that would decrease their power?

      This is by design. I guarantee Israeli money gets funneled to Hamas so Hamas can in turn attack Israel then Israel retaliates with far far more force as usual, so on so forth.

      The easiest way to get rid of Palestine when you have every major super powers backing is to simply cause then to attack you and win a war of attrition, subjugation, annexation, absorbtion and either erasure or outright propagandizing the entire thing. Like the US and Canada have done with native Americans.

      • @Anamnesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        I’m not a supporter of Israel but do you have any source that supports this speculation? Seems irresponsible to bandy it about.

        • @Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Other than the fact that Hamas was explicitly created by Israel to feed a secular v non secular Palestinian fued? They deny it but everyone knows they’re lying because the Israeli army quite literally stepped aside or left when they showed up.

          • @SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            My knowledge on Hamas amounts to the first half of their Wikipedia page so I’d love to learn some more about their. While I can Google their name I’m going to get some weirdly biased shit that will probably contradict itself quickly. Got any suggestions for sources I can read up on to learn more about Israel’s influence there?

          • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You probably talking about this article

            https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/hamas-israel-palestine-conflict/

            That article has such a stupid take. It takes tiny pieces of quotes from a couple of ex-Israeli officials and with one of them is clearly omitting context. Did Israel permit Islamist groups to do stuff like build mosques and have charities? Yes. Did he also say, but it is not mentioned in the article, that they were completely peaceful at the time and that Israel didn’t want to be viewed as attacking Islam? Also yes.

            See, what you are saying is that Israel created Hamas by not using more oppression to stop these groups at a time when they were not attacking Israel, but the PLO was. And that is just such a simple naive take that it is ridiculous. Yeah if Israel could redo things, they might have decided that was a good idea. But then again, what if it just caused more attacks from the surrounding countries after they were claimed to be “attacking Islam.” Then would we also blame Israel for those attacks due to them repressing the Islamist movements?

            It even does the same by using cherry picked foresight about Afghanistan. It entirely ignores the situation in Afghanistan and just implies that the US caused Al Qaeda. Things just aren’t that simple. It’s entirely possible that had the US and other countries not interfered in Afghanistan that the soviet union would’ve lasted longer and Afghanistan might’ve been another Chechnya.

            At the time, Israel was having to fight against the PLO. They were not fighting against the religious Islamic groups. And knowing the history of the time period and the politics in the region, the very religious groups were not nearly the force that they are now. So they made choices for reasons that absolutely made sense at the time. And we have no way of knowing how things would be different if they made different choices.

            We can say that places that aren’t Israel still have issues with the Muslim brotherhood or are friendly with them all over the middle east. And Israel certainly didn’t create the Muslim Brotherhood. And if Israel didn’t exist and it was all a Palestinian state with a secular government, it isn’t a stretch to say that they would be in that area too, calling for an Islamist government. As they have done in Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and more.

            • @Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Poor take buddy, the us didnt create al queda no. They did however push enough Intel and weapons into their hands they became the regional power for a time.

              There is cause and effect and you can’t ignore any of it especially the result regardless of if it was intentional or simply poorly thought out.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Well there’s the fact that Israel legitimately got Hamas started in the first place because it hampered the Palestinian left in their efforts to combat the settlements.

    • @swcollings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      This. Peace cannot come unless the civilians on both sides are loudly and forcefully willing to die rather than kill civilians on the other side. The problems can only be solved on an individual level.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The only way that is solve is from the outside.

      Which means treating Israel as Appartheid South Africa was treated, and Hamas as a terrorist group.

      However only the last part is done, so the result is every day in Palestine people are born who will live under the boot of Israel and eventually feel they have nothing to loose because of Israel and Israelis, and join Hamas to fight the oppressor, because it’s only way to do something with a lifetime of anger and because even being part of a Hamas deemed a terrorist organisation all over the world and limited in their action, status and wealth by it, is still better than a “nothing to loose” situation.

      The refusal of Europe and the US to also force the one with the most to lose - Israel - to pull back the boot that’s making all those “nothing to loose, desperate and angry” alongside their attempt at making Hamas an unappeling option is what has kept the cycle of violence going.

      The blood is mainly on the hands of the US leaders and a number of European leaders because they’re the only ones who could stop this (since they’re the only ones with the power to stop both sides at the same time, which is the only way to sort this out) and they most certainly have the kind of bright and well informed advisers who would have pointed it out to them, and instead have endorsed Israel’s strategy of “tire the Palestineans till they give up and leave”, in other words, endorsing genocide.

  • Blue
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    If one day someone comes to your house, the one you were born, the same house where your father was born, and his father before him. And starts killing, raping, torturing, executing, bulldozing the houses were your cousins lives, they don’t let you go to your sacred places, they don’t let you even move from the concentration camps and the walls they have erected.

    What would you do? You fight, even if you lose you will fight, even if the world sees the injustice but simply doesn’t care, you will still fight, for them you are a terrorist, but for your people you are a freedom fighter, fighting against invaders.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        Seriously, I can sympathize with the frustration up to the point where suddenly murdering civilians is ok when “the good guys” are doing it.

        Material conditions my ass, if it’s wrong for one it’s wrong for all.

        And before any Hamaboos show their asses,

        انا امريكاني فالاسطيني، جدي كن من بيتلحم،

        My kin are not your shield for endorsing the same acts you hold up to demonize those you hate you Bougeyevik hypocrites.

      • Blue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Additionally, you’re basically saying that Hamas is [justified in slaughtering hundreds of unarmed

        The fact the Israel state contribute to the creation of those monsters, you can’t expect the hate to just disappear.

      • @Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’m sorry to say, but this is how guerilla warfare goes. Sometimes civilians are casualties.

        Did those civilians do anything to deserve it? Usually no. In this case though, they did. Some were already there, and they were responsible for starting the civil war by accepting to split the country. Others weren’t there, but came after that - trampling on another country’s ashes and disregarding its original citizens.

        What are you going to do when civilians move into your home and declare it is theirs? Consider them civilians? Consider them innocents?

    • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      What would you do?

      I would not beat, rape, and murder innocent people. That seems like a low bar to clear, right? Attacking military targets and personnel might be morally justified, but certainly not what they did over the weekend.

      • @steveman_ha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        How many of the “terrorists” (the Islamic ones, not the Judaic ones) were actually from the oppressed populations, though? There are a lottttttt of people in that region that hate the Israeli government…Not sure how many of the displaced peoples you’re telling “this isn’t the right way to avenge violent state oppression” are actually participating in the fighting.

        • @jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          He didn’t tell any of the non participants any such thing… His statement obviously refers to those commiting the acts, not generalized to everyone.

          That perspective does not excuse Israel’s behavior or blame any victim of Israel’s injustice, it simply points out the attacks are terroristic (meaning targeting civilians). Terrorists often have sympathetic reasons, but go about it in a way that is wrong.

          • @SwampYankee@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            The Ottoman Land Code of 1858 is a good place to start. Essentially much of Palestine was misappropriated to Ottoman bureaucrats and the Ottoman state. The Jewish National Fund purchased portions of this land and leased it to Jewish settlers who kicked the Arabs out with the cooperation of their Ottoman landlords. Legal, but unjust, and I have to imagine most of the Jewish settlers were as ignorant as the Arabs were to the fact that their land had been sold out from under them.

    • @protovack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Why leave out the fact that the Jews also have an equally legitimate claim on the land, in addition to having been taken close to the brink of total extermination by circumstances completely beyond their control? A normal, compassionate individual would welcome these people in, make room for them, and live at peace under a stable society, tolerant of different points of view. However, that is not what the Jews encountered upon the creation of Israel. It was just a continuation of the campaign to exterminate them, from a different group. Are you going to argue that it’s bad for Germans to murder Jews, but it is okay for Muslims?

      • Blue
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        The Israel state was created thanks to the influence of wealthy Jews.

        A normal, compassionate individual would welcome these people in, make room for them, and live at peace under a stable society, tolerant of different points of view

        Until your guest started asking for more land, more control, and ultimately doesn’t want yo share with you but wants the things you have.

      • @Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Believe it or not, but the world isn’t simply comprised of goodies and baddies. We don’t live in a Marvel movie.

        • @jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          His point is that if you want international support don’t go around murdering innocent people then parade their bodies around.

        • @jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          He didn’t imply that Israel were the goodies. It’s more like both sides have people being baddies.

          Also, you have a lot of innocent on both sides. That’s why both sides get called out for being baddies as they are hurting innocents. There’s a good chance that Hamas even killed some folks who have never done anything but be sympathetic to the Palestinian plight.

          Terroristic is the right description, and can also be applied to some of Israel’s behavior towards Palestinians.

      • @Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Israel is doing a genocide. Palestinians fighting back are absolutely not doing the same crimes.

    • @SankaraStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nah, man. If they cited all those things, or more importantly the complete stifling of Gazans’ ability to prosper or flourish today, that would be one thing. What did they cite instead? The desecration of the Al-Aqsa mosque. That is more important to them than the apartheid. Fuck Hamas. They’re accomplishing nothing more than the death of Palestinians and more suffering. And they just empowered the most right wing, unpopular government that Israel’s ever had, one that Israelis were divided against. Hamas and the Iranian regime need to be eradicated. They are hurting any chance at Palestinian freedom and equality and right to prosperity. And they’re just causing more and more every day normal Israeli/Jewish and Palestinian suffering. This Iranian regime supports the tyranny of the Syrian government over the Sunnis (and its use of chemical weapons against them), Russia’s terrorist attacks on civilians in Ukraine and the invasion of that country in general, the complete undermining of the Lebanese government by Hezbollah, and the complete overthrow of the Yemeni government by a similarly tyrannical group in Yemen. And it uses of rape and sexual violence and murder against men and women protesting the death of a woman caused by the morality police and the oppression of women by the regime.

      I think the only way to accomplish either a true one state democratic nation that honors Israel-Palestine as the home of Judaism or a two state solution, is boycott and divestment (because there is no way to peacefully protest and engage in civil obedience to achieve freedom and equality (they murdered a journalist and nothing came of it) and there’s no way to win militarily). It worked with the apartheid government in South Africa, and hopefully it will work with Israel.

    • @arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Hamas are absolutely headbanging murderous zealots committing a lot of atrocities right now. But if you herd people up, deprive them of basic liberties, brutalize & kill a bunch of them, and steal their land at gunpoint and then you can hardly act all shocked that a bunch of them are radicalized and go on a rampage. Doesn’t matter if we’re talking what Israel has done to Palestinians or what the United States did to Native Americans. Maybe the lesson to learn here, is don’t do those things. But I expect that Israel will pound Gaza committing its own atrocities as payback and the same thing will happen again in another decade.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As a side note, if you want to spot the Press that are at least trying to be neutral, you can see how they refere to the Hamas people that inflitrated Israel:

      • The neutral Press will call them something like “guerrilas” (same as, for example, they would refer to the FARC types in Colombia if they attacked a city), “militants” or “infiltrators”.
      • The biased Press will call them “terrorists”
      • @Imotali@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        They are terrorists. That’s literally what they are. The fact that attacked an evil fascist state’s city doesn’t change that.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I’m happy that everybody who kills people to terrify the rest into doing what they want are consistently called terrorists.

          So both Hamas and the Israeli state.

          As actual and clear acts of “killing people to terrify the rest do what they want”, like bombing of hospitals, murdering of journalists and killing children throwing stones at the armored bulldozers razing their homes, all commited by one side, have consistently never been described as “terrorism” (even though they match the definition), it’s a pretty good indication of the bias by a media outlet when they now describe the entirety of the military incursion from one side and all its participants as “terrorism” even though they refrained to call actual acts of “killing people to terrify the rest do what they want” from the other side as “acts of terror” and those who executed them as “terrorists”.

          The unbiased thing to do is to consistently describe all “attacks meant to incite terror for the purposed of making the rest do what you want” (such as Hamas’ terrorists murdering people at a dance party, and Iraeli Army terrorists bombing civilian buildings and executing journalists and children) as “terror attacks” and those who executed them as “terrorists”.

          • @Imotali@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Israel can’t be called terrorism because terrorism must be—by definition—unlawful

            the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

            Emphasis mine.

            • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              As Israel did their deeds outside internationally recognized Israeli territory - so outside the internationally recognized jurisdiction of their courts - hence were Israeli Law does not apply.

              So those deeds were unlawful (no matter how much Israeli Law is rigged to say otherwise), and even by that twisted definition you selected of “terrorism” that defines it so that state-sponsered terror attacks on a nation’s own soil do not count as “terrorism”, Israel’s military attacks on civilians anywhere outside the internationally recognized borders of Israel (so including Gaza) for the purpose of intimidating the population are still terrorism because the Law that does apply there says they’re unlawful.

    • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      What if it was a tornado? Do you still fight it to your last standing men or do you accept the fact that you can’t win?

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 years ago

    How can Hamas even think they have an iota of a chance against a military power like Israel?

    It makes no sense.

    • V H
      link
      fedilink
      English
      602 years ago

      A victim of bullying will eventually lash out whether or not they think they have a chance because they become desperate.

        • V H
          link
          fedilink
          English
          182 years ago

          They are a victim of bullying when they’ve been under decades of illegal occupation. Hamas is an awful organization, but it was only formed as a result of ongoing brutal oppression. When you keep punching someone in the face, sooner or later they’ll start punching back, and sometimes they’ll fight dirty. That doesn’t make them good, but the bully is still the one who kicked things off in the first place and the one who should be first and foremost held responsible for the situation they created.

          Hamas individual victims get my full sympathy; they’re victims of both Hamas and Israel. Israel as a state does not - without their brutal oppression, extensive war crimes, and apartheid regime, there wouldn’t be any Hamas in the first place.

          • @Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            What if the bully went up to someone and said “I’m going to fucking kill you” and then tried to kill them using all means possible all because the bully and the other person exist in the same area? Only Palestine and Hamas before now were the ones saying the Jews deserved death AND acted upon it multiple times. I had sympathy for their plight until they indiscriminately killed people who had zero interaction with their problems. I’m sure those thai workers and rave tourists, massacred, raped, killed and kidnapped has a lot to do with the fucking situation between Israel and Hamas/Palestine. Israel isn’t clean, but in 1 day and 1 act became the cleaner of the 2 in non Arab public perception.

            • V H
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 years ago

              Nice “whatabout”, but the bully here is the party that engaged in an illegal occupation, the crime of apartheid, and extensive war crimes (annexation through settlement of occupied territory) in the first place. That you try to redefine away the fact that Israel created this situation in the first place borders on apartheid-apologism. It’s exactly the same tactic used by supporters of South African apartheid to dismiss the situation in South Africa whenever the ANC carried out a violent operation, and it was apologism for oppression then, and it is apologism for oppression now.

              • @Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Nah fam, if you want to play that game Arabs invaded Jewish communities that had settled there during the muslim conquests, that’s over 2,000 years of illegal occupation. If you’re fine with that, you should be fine with Israel taking back their land at the “edge of a sword”.

                Also it’s funny to hear you say killing innocent people not involved with the conflict is “apartheid apology”

                • V H
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  62 years ago

                  Only one party is currently illegally occupying land they have legal claim to and engaging in the crime of apartheid. Only one party is engaged in fighting against an illegal occupier. That you choose to argue in favour of the apartheid regime engaged in an illegal occupation says enough.

            • @clanginator@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              What if the bully went up to someone and said “I’m going to fucking kill you” and then tried to kill them using all means possible all because the bully and the other person exist in the same area?

              This sentence alone shows your complete and utter lack of understanding of the situation and the history that has led to it.

              Jewish population in 1917 was 8%, but 1936 that was 28%. In 1948, during the Nakba, it jumped from 32% to 82%. Palestinians were the indigenous people of Palestine until the Zionist movement INTENTIONALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY took over, killed, burnt down, and destroyed not only men women and children, but every facet of Palestinian culture they could.

              They shut Palestine out of negotiations and diplomatic channels, and ran straight-up propaganda campaigns in America to convince numbskulls like you who believe the slant they hear on Fox news about how Hamas are just terrorists.

              Hamas actually attempted to be a legitimate government that played by the rules, as did the PLO. They were backstabbed, lied to, led on, and ignored by US, UN, Israel, Britain, etc.

              I had sympathy for their plight until they indiscriminately killed people who had zero interaction with their problems

              You can have sympathy for the plight of the Palestinian people while condemning actions taken by militants. Nuance is possible here.

        • 🐱TheCat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          When you say ‘destroying their neighbors culture’ - are you talking about Israel or Palestine?

      • @protovack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Why leave out the fact that the Jews also have an equally legitimate claim on the land, in addition to having been taken close to the brink of total extermination by circumstances completely beyond their control? A normal, compassionate individual would welcome these people in, make room for them, and live at peace under a stable society, tolerant of different points of view. However, that is not what the Jews encountered upon the creation of Israel. It was just a continuation of the campaign to exterminate them, from a different group. Are you going to argue that it’s bad for Germans to murder Jews, but it is okay for Muslims?

        • V H
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Firstly, see “The law of belligerent occupation in the Supreme Court of Israel”, David Kretzmer, Professor Emeritus of International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, published in the International Review of the Red Cross, 2012:

          Not even the Israeli government or the Israeli Supreme Court agree with you that Israel has a legitimate claim to the territories beyond their internationally recognised borders. Maybe somebody here is talking about the entirety of Israel, but I am not, nor have I ever. If Israel were to withdraw to their borders, and Palestinian attacks still continue, then there’d be at least room for discussion of blame.

          Until then, as long as Israel itself legally recognizes that it is an occupying power, there is none.

          Secondly, people’s experience of being oppressed does not recognize law. Irrespective of who has ownership of what, Israel is engaged in treating Gaza in particular as an Apartheid-style bantustan, and is committing crimes against humanity by doing so.

          Whether or not you agree with the legal position on that, when someone places people in those conditions, then it is entirely on them when they hit back.

          Blaming people for resisting gross abuse because you don’t like how they do it when you’ve put them in a situation where they have no realistic opportunity to fight clean is victim-blaming.

          Are you going to argue that it’s bad for Germans to murder Jews, but it is okay for Muslims?

          Nice try. I’ve not argued it is okay for anyone. I’ve argued in some threads that unless you’ve provided a better alternative (and not suggested it; actually tried to make it come to pass), then like the rest of us you’re not in a moral position to judge people for taking desperate steps to try to fight back.

          That doesn’t mean not feeling for the victims, because they had no power to end this either. It doesn’t mean not thinking it’s a horrible situation. It doesn’t mean you can’t get angry. It means resisting the urge to assign the blame to a people the vast majority of whom have been born into effective bondage under an apartheid regime for taking desperate and irrational actions to try to end a gross abuse they have no realistic power to change.

    • @boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      552 years ago

      It makes sense, but not the way you think. They know they are going to lose. They know they are going to suffer greater retaliation. But they will have to endure it. And they know many of them will die because of it. Rhey were ready to suffer.

      I don’t think this campaign is against the Israeli government. It’s a strategic move targeted towards the illegal Israeli settlers and those who dare to encroach into the disputed Palestinian land! - to instill traumatic fear. It’s a warning message to these people, even though the have the best military and the best surveillance techs, the government can’t protect them. A stern message to them: If you dare to take this land from us, one day we will come to take it back from you, even your life, at the time you least expected and every efforts you put before will be in vain.

      • @merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        You’re forgetting the key aspect – they want Israel to attack. These are hardcore committed militants. They want to kill their enemies or die trying. They want other people to feel the same way, but too many Palestinians are just trying to live their lives and survive day-to-day.

        By attacking Israel, they know they’re going to prompt a vicious counter attack that will kill and maim a lot of Palestinians. That’s good from the point of view of the Palestinian militants. More people who lose their loved ones to Israeli attacks means more angry people wanting to lash out. That means more of them will hate Israel even more, and be even more willing to risk their lives to try to destroy Israel.

        It’s also a gift to Netanyahu and the right-wingers in Israel. They want the Israeli population to be scared and angry, because when they’re scared and angry they support the right-wingers. This instantly solves all the political and legal problems that Netanyahu had.

        This is the same strategy that Osama bin Laden used with the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks, and it worked perfectly. He knew that the US would flip out and overreact and kill hundreds of thousands of people as a result. He hoped they’d attack Saudi Arabia because his biggest conflict was not with the US, but with the government there. Instead the US attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, but that was almost as good. It drove recruitment for al Qaeda, and later for the Islamic State.

        • @boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Not surprisingly, I do agree with your perspective: They want Israeli to attack. They want to chance change the status quo.

          They want other people to feel the same way, but too many Palestinians are just trying to live their lives and survive day-to-day.

          When you say ‘many Palestinians’, I would say those are the ones who live in the West Bank, controlled by Fatah. Fatah made acceptable deals with Israeli, and somenow their live are getting better, more survivable. But Hamas doesnt agree with these deals. They have a very narrow mindset which is: No deals with the Israel, period. And the people of Gaza supported this POV and they elected Hamas in the first place, which means they are ready to suffer the consequences when giving the support.

          Palestinians are divided into two fractions. In some ways, the attack could be an attempt to reunite and change it back to one.

          • @Skates@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            They have a very narrow mindset which is: No deals with the Israel, period

            Hmm, I’ve heard that before, with slightly different phrasing: “we don’t negotiate with terrorists”.

            It seems like a good view.

      • @Sheldybear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Except that these attacks weren’t against the settlers (who are taking land in the west bank), it’s targeting the civilians in South Israel who have lived there for ages. I think the world was expecting to see this violence in the west bank, not gaza.

        • @boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I could be wrong on that. I stand corrected if that’s the case.

          I think the world was expecting to see this violence in the west bank, not gaza.

          Yes, but it’s best to attack where it is least expected. Other than that, it’s open to discussion/speculation. Whatever it is, it is a very well thought and executed plan where they expect great retaliation. One thing, The Hamas don’t trust Fatah, and some pro-Palestin Muslim even regard Fatah as traitor. Maybe the Saudi-Israel normalisation plan got something to do with it? Maybe someone can give their input on these.

          I check Ofakim, one of the affected area.

          In 2010, about one-fifth of the residents were ultra-Orthodox and one third were immigrants from the former Soviet Union. Most of the rest were members and descendants of the founding generation of the immigrants who arrived in the town in the 1950s and 1960s. In addition, there are small communities of Ethiopian Jews and Palestinians originally from the Gaza Strip who were resettled in Israel after collaborating with Israeli authorities.[5][6]

          According to the Central Bureau of Statistics, Ofakim had a population of 30,662 in 2019, and the population is growing at a rate of 1.4% a year. The percentage of the share of the Arab Palestinian population of Ofakim is very small and about 0.7%.[1]

          You’re right on that. They population has been there since the 50s.

        • @Skates@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          it’s targeting the civilians in South Israel who have lived there for ages

          Not for ages. Only since the country was split into two with no regard for actual Palestinian input on this. There’s been less than 100 years since then. Not enough time to heal, especially when nothing was done to make things right. It’s like telling black people in the US in 1700 “it’s been ages since you’ve been brought here on a boat, just let it go, this is the way things are now”. Very much fuck you & no.

          It seems like a very clear message by Hamas: if you moved into my house by force, you are not a civilian. Get out of my house.

      • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        A combination of this and a religion that brainwashed them into thinking that if they die while trying to murder other people that they will go to paradise and have a bunch of little girls as wives.

    • @ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      They are desperate, frustrated, angry… They are human.

      Neutrally looked at, a couple of french farmers and craftmen had no chance against the french military of 1789. But they where pushed to a point where they believed doing nothing is worse than dying trying. By chance they actually stormed the Bastille and kickstarzed a very dark chapter in french history.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      They’re genocidal lunatics covering their hatred in colors of justice and victimhood

      They don’t care about an actual chance, they just follow the directions their masters in tehran give them because they’ll happily make themselves dogs if it means they get to go full turner diaries wet dream mode.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Exactly. The same thing happened before again and again. The result was always the same. Death and misery for the people in Gaza.

        The whole region needs to be put under supervision by an international committee and bring Israel’s borders back to its original limits and give back the right to the people of Gaza and West Bank the right to their own land and allow them to exchange with other nations.

        • @SwampYankee@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          bring Israel’s borders back to its original limits

          Which the Arabs voted against in the first place. They never wanted a Jewish state there and their rhetoric would suggest they still don’t. The only difference is now there is one, and there has been for most of a century.

    • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      They are targeting civilians not the military. They want to cause so much pain and suffering the Israeli people will push their govt to cede demands of Hamas to stop the fighting, or emmigrate somewhere else

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      They have been pushed into a corner and kept on getting squeezed, so probably feel they have no other options (and might very well be right in light of what has happenned in the last decade).

      Had Israel stopped expanding “colonates” and taking palestinian land, I doubt the likes of Hamas would have the internal support and manpower to do what they just did, but over the last several decades Bibi and his predecessors have been just dubbling down and announcing ever more anexation of land.

      The massive difference in military power is also probably the reason for the kidnappings: I suspect it’s a “strategy” to try and get the Israeli authorities to not just bomb the whole of Gaza.

      Whilst I disagree with their methods I can see how over 70 years, given the trend in israeli politics and the lack of genuine and effective pushback from the international community against appartheid in Israel and the occupation, so many Palestineans have come to believe they have no other options than this kind of thing and personally I actually see no other option (even this they’re doing now is not really an option, more like a lashing out of the desperate).

      It is clearly impossible to solve this from the inside (to much hate by now, too many assholes on both side whose power rests in the assholes from the other side killing people), which is why I think the US’ and Europe’s treatement of Israel as if it’s a Developed, Democratic, Western nation, all the while it’s more akin to a Theocratic South Africa with a Russia-style leadership, is probably to blame more for this than anybody else (and I say this as an European) - they were the only ones who could have forced a peaceful resolution to this (rather than just mild criticism and no action, which is all that Europe did) by doing the same they did to South Africa, but instead they did nothing at all, effectivelly endorsing the choices of the Israeli leadership and totally disenfranchising the Palestinians, prolonging this cycle - want to see who has the most blood in their hands on this, go look in the White House, Number 10, Deutsche Kanselarie and the Palace Du Eliseé.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        It’s a shame because western countries were starting to recognize the apartheid situation in Israel and were starting to criticize it. I think had things gone a bit longer there would have been an intervention.

        In any case, this whole thing is just sad. So many innocent lives are destroyed on both sides. And I sincerely think Israel, their government and the Jewish extremists are the root cause.

      • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

        “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

        To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

        The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

        Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

        This isn’t good-faith criticism.

        These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

  • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 years ago

    POTUS Biden already gave a response on supporting their military ally, Israel, and if I see one more braindead fucking comment like “sUrE BUt WhERe wAs HAwAiI’s FaST ReSPoNsE?” Within 4 hours he sent aid an national guard response, idk how right wingers keep using that stupid fucking talking point.

    That said I really don’t appreciate the onesidedness of the USA response, I have much higher hopes for the UN council assigned to this issue and any UN Task Forces deployed in the future. I believe Israel mostly caused this issue on their own by the apartheid oppression of Palestinians, I think this outcome and many other attrocities would have been completely avoided in the timeline where Rabin wasn’t assassinated

    • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I have much higher hopes for the UN council assigned to this issue and any UN Task Forces deployed in the future.

      LOL! You really don’t understand anything about how the world works, do you?

      I believe Israel mostly caused this issue on their own by the apartheid oppression of Palestinians, I think this outcome and many other attrocities would have been completely avoided in the timeline where Rabin wasn’t assassinated

      Conveniently skipping over Ariel Sharon there aren’t you? You know that time when Israel removed all settlements and ended the occupation of part of Palestine as a goodwill gesture? What happened after that? Something for you to look into.

      • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        LOL! You really don’t understand anything about how the world works, do you?

        UNSCO and UNDOF both have headquarters in Jerusalem and consistently have teams both in offices and on the ground upholding ceasefires and patrolling the borders. They’ve easily done more good with fewer resources than all singular nations combined on this topic.

        • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Yes the UN can help in being observers after a ceasefire is agreed upon.

          Does it look like there’s an imminent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas?

          Do you think there’s are UN citizens that sign up for the UN military and go through training to serve on UN missions? Not how it is.

          The way it really works is the UN asks actual countries to provide soldiers for these missions. So which countries do you think are going to send their soldiers to fucking Gaza based on a promise by Hamas not to attack them?

          And UN observers don’t fight wars. They just report to both parties of the ceasefire the activities of the other. If either side takes military action the observers leave. Hamas fires rockets at Israel every week. Just that the Iron Dome takes them out and you don’t hear about it. But if you’re the leader of a country are you going to send your soldiers somewhere there will constantly be rockets flying over them with the potential that if the Iron Dome might clip on and divert it into your soldiers?

          • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            If my memory isn’t failing: then Israel will bomb some apartments, raid and beat some holy sites, eventually call a ceasefire before all the civilians die from lack of food, water, and power, then build more checkpoints and fenced off areas, and finally we’ll be right back here again in a few years until there are no more Palestinians.

            So to answer your question, yes. If it weren’t for the UN I really truly believe Israel would just commit genocide.

            • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              You’ve obviously consumed a lot of internet propaganda originating from Iran.

              Israel’s intent were actually genocide they could simply drop a nuke on Gaza and there would be nothing the UN could do to stop it. They don’t do that because their intent isn’t on genocide.

              Also the UN cannot be in Israel without the consent of Israel. Nations have ultimate sovereignty over their territory there is nothing about the UN that supersedes national sovereignty. Seems you’ve also fallen prey to the “black helicopter” UN conspiracy theories, just you think UN black helicopters are a good thing. The reality is they don’t exist, UN peacekeepers are only where they are because nations have agreed to their presence to observe the other party of a treaty (and will allow themselves to be likewise observed) to ensure they are complying.

              You should take some time to learn about how things work in the world instead of just believing everything you read on social media. The can provide tools that nations can use to facilitate peace, but the nations themselves decide whether to use those tools.

              • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                Israel

                Literally sent

                Netanyahu

                To Court

                Over This

                What the hell kind of Iranian Propoganda originates in the courts of Israel?! He was literally removed from power because of the corruption trials.

                • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  Israel sends Netanyahu to court over many things. He’s a really crooked dude. So you’re gonna have to narrow down which specific case you’re going on about.

  • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    as usual, the Palestinian death toll is now at least 5 times higher than the Israeli death toll and Israel isn’t done yet

    Don’t lose sight of who the aggressor is.

    • Kalash
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s a poorly equipped terrorist group fighting against a full fleged national military force. If the current death toll is only 5 times higher for Hamas, they really chaught Isreal off guard with that attack.

      • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Did u not see the map? Israel has been eliminating Palestine for decades and tiny Palestine is the big bad guy here, according to you?

        Some of the people all of the time, I guess

        • Kalash
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Israel has been eliminating Palestine for decades

          Both sides have been trying to “eliminate” each other for decades. It’s just Israel is winning.

          and tiny Palestine is the big bad guy here, according to you?

          It generally makes no sense to talk about “good” or “bad” in international politics.

          But let’s look at it from this way: There is no possibility of a Palestinian victory by military means and there hasn’t been in a long time. Yet, everytime there was peace process it get’s rejected by Palestine and they cling to their demand of the total destruction if Israel.

          At this point fighting Israel is just fighting for the sake of fighting, inflicting suffering on Israel and martyrdom.

          Israel isn’t going anywhere. So in a realistic sense it’s on Palestine to come to the negotiation table and settle for peace (and yes, the condition are now much worse then in 1993). Or they can choose to fight a lost cause … to the death.

          • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Look at anither way. England gave half of Palestine to their enemies…why should Palestine have agreed to any of this in the first place? Oh that’s right they didn’t and this was shoved down their throats. Some would say illegally.

            Palestine basically paid for what the Germans did to the Jews.

  • Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    402 years ago

    I find the timing of this suspicious, given there’s rumours the negotiations between the US and SA are in their final stages.

    If SA is about to throw Palestine under the bus, as is rumoured, that could explain the timing.

    • @akrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      You’re on point, Hezbollah released a statement backing up that claim, a warning for “normalization”.

      • @Duvidl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        It wouldn’t. That’s the point. Having Hamas do that seems like a perfect excuse to throw palestine under the bus. Which they would do with the agreement, anyhow. Now they have a reason.

        • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ah, I see what you mean, but I don’t think I agree. There’s no relevant party that is opposed to this attack, opposed to the treaty, and important enough to justify the risk of getting caught.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Iran trying to get the first move advantage in what they’d deam the inevitable opening of yet another proxy war with KSA

  • TwoGems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    This feels way too convenient for Netanyahu.

    • @DrTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Nor really. A large part of Natenyahu’s platform is security. “Keep me in power and I will protect you”. He has failed in this spectacularly, and Mossads reputation will take a very significant hit. Hamas has made them look incompetent. Of course he will use this to demand more authority, but overall it is bad for him.

    • dantheclamman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Somewhat, but it also undermines his “Mr. Security” image…a lot. He will assuredly blame it on the left, but when he’s running against former military brass, rings hollow. Also really pulls the rug out from under his various peace accords

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Are we supposed to believe Israeli intelligence missed this?

  • @protovack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    badly drawn maps are a major culprit. its clear many commenters are young and don’t know the actual history. i’m a bit surprised by just how many pro-hamas posts ive seen. its a little disturbing. read your history. there is very little that the modern state of Israel could have done to prevent any of this. these extremists want total annihilation of israel. what can israel do against terrorists whose stated goal is to participate in a holy war which they believe is their ticket to heaven? it’s an unwinnable conflict. peace talks only work if all sides actually want peace (and just disagree about how to accomplish it) every insane group of extremists across history has had to be dealt with forcefully, at some point, in some way or another, for all of human history. the japanese, germans, soviets, koreans, all needed to be dealt with, and in all cases it required overwhelming force sustained by wide coalitions over many years.

    this is no different. if you are young, don’t know the history, and are sitting in your room thinking there is some special concession Israel could give, that would turn this all around, its time to hit the library. The reality is that there isn’t really any land in the area that would work for that. The available land that is compatible with human civilization in that part of the world, is completely full. There is no “amazon” that could be cut down to build new areas for Palestinians to live. It’s a hot, arid, inhospitable part of the world, and civilization is clustered around natural rivers and mountainous locations. There’s no place for anyone to go.

    And then there’s the ideology. Even if Israel and some broad coalition decided to invest trillions in some massive infrastructure project to make Gaza the best place in the world to live, the terrorists would still do exactly what they’re doing today. The point you have to understand, is that Hamas does not care about Palestinians. Repeat that to yourself 10x and commit it to your brain forever. Islamic extremists do not care about achieving peaceful cooperation with people of other faiths and ideologies on planet earth. Nor do they even care about their own people.

    People in the west are extremely soft and ignorant in some ways. They’ve grown up immersed in a culture of relative stability, judeo-christian ethics, etc. They have no concept that there are people out there who share none of that. They literally don’t care. And the proof is all over twitter. Go watch, let it soak in.

    Only a broad coalition with massive force can end this, just like every other time. otherwise its just on an endless cycle.

  • @protovack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    based on many of these threads here and on reddit, im starting to think that there is much more anti-semitism in the world than I thought there was. And the veil is getting much thinner.

    • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      Don’t confuse criticism of the Israeli government for antisemitism. They have a history of treating Palestinians like absolute garbage, and pushing them more and more and then acting shocked when they push back.

      I do not condone the attacks from Hamas on innocent people, but the Israeli government is not innocent in this.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Only a racist would confuse a sovereign nation with a religion and hence criticism of the actions of said sovereign nation with criticism of a religion.

      Anybody claiming anything in the name of all people in this World who are members of the Jewish religion (such as claiming that Israel represent all those people) is by definition a racist because they’re literally implying “they’re all the same”: the racism of thinking of all people who are Jewish are the same (and worse, thinking you can speak for all of them) is specifically called anti-semitism.