A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    1142 years ago

    Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

    He wasn’t giving me material for my viewers, so I kept annoying him until he shot me! Why is this my fault?!

  • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    692 years ago

    I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don’t know what you’d sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

    • @Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 years ago

      I think getting shot is punishment enough, but Cook should at least be banned from posting anymore pranks to his YouTube. They should really shut down his YouTube channel if we’re being honest and nothing of value will be lost.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Fuck all that. Attitudes like that are why Americans think they can just blast away. You won’t see my pistol until I’m certain killing you is my very last resort. And if I pull it, it’s because I mean to use it.

      Did this idiot think his life was in danger from an annoying man with a cell phone, in the middle of a fucking food court?! No. He used his gun as a “get off of me” tool. He’s damned lucky Cook survived.

      EDIT: I seriously hope some of you people do not conceal carry. The comments here are terrifying and completely ignorant of case law, attitudes comprised only of feels.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        302 years ago

        So you’re going to wait until you’re hit/shot to try and pull your gun out?

        The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hit the guy. This is exactly when you need to have your gun out.

        • @shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The aggressor was a loud-mouthed bully in a very public place. I’ve dealt with these assholes since elementary school in the 70s. They’re cowards, one and all. Perhaps such behavior is more threatening to younger folks? I gather kids don’t get their ass beat on the regular in school any longer? In any case, I think I would have instantly known what I was looking at.

          Also, seems the bully didn’t speak any “fighting words”, and that may be key. OTOH, Virginia holds no duty to retreat. Feels like thin legal ice for the shooter.

          And no, I’m not giving him the chance to hit me. I’m hyper aware of my ability to draw. If I felt that option was about to be taken from me? Yeah, that almost certainly would have crossed the line.

      • @joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        192 years ago

        He could very well think that. One friend of mine gets a fraid for his saftey if protest is in the area. I have scared the shit out of people by just walking near them.

        Now in the era of mass shooting would i be afraid that some ahole came up to like would i think this is a prelude to getting shot. I might honestly think that

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Agree. Even under the broadest, natural law justification for self defense, this wasn’t self defense. The dude had no basis to conclude his life was in danger.

        • @shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Seems these people are forgetting this was in a, presumably crowded, food court, and not a dark alley. Shooter is on very thin legal ice, very thin.

          Also, seems some of these folks don’t have experience with the garden variety bully. This wasn’t some madman running up on the shooter, this was a bigger guy clearly trying to get a reaction.

          If the aggressor had spoken any “fighting words”, and yes that’s a legal term, I might well have shot him. That does not seem to have been the case.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      Pain and emotional suffering is always available. If he pressed charges then all of his legal fees as well. The lost wages from being locked up… etc.

  • @Someonelol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    662 years ago

    These prank channels should be completely demonetized to remove the incentive of doing stupid shit like this in the first place.

    • @Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      302 years ago

      No shit curse first 10 seconds get demonetized. Terrorize some one and you can earn 3k a month. YouTube should remove his channel and if they don’t get fucking sue to for allowing the content.

      Fucking shooter a hero and stood his ground prankster should apologize and be greatful he isn’t dead.

      Because as any train gun owner knows your not supposed to pull your gun unless it shoot to kill.

      • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        While I agree the YouTube kid kind of got what was coming to him, the shooter isn’t a straight up hero.

        As annoying as this kid was it doesn’t sound like he ever touched the guy. I would completely understand the shooter shoving, punching, or even using mace/taser on the YouTube guy, but jumping straight to shooting someone over that is just a bit unhinged behavior, at least in my opinion.

        I am not against CCW or self defense or anything, but the shooter definitely went overboard, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he is found guilty in the court case.

        • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Yeah, weird take that annoying somebody or even getting up in their face is grounds for execution. Get security, get the cops, whatever. They weren’t in any danger. They were just scared.

          • @pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            People get scared because they think they are in danger. The delivery driver didn’t know where things were going to stop in this encounter, and I don’t blame him one bit for putting a stop to it before he got beaten or stabbed.

            But if the delivery driver wasn’t scared it wouldn’t have been a fun prank for mr 6 foot 5 and his dimwit subscribers. He relies on intimidation to get away with his shenanigans, if he wasn’t so physically threatening he would have had his ass beat before now, and deservedly so. Fuck that guy.

            • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Laws don’t dictate morality and entrenching “being scared” as the basis for self-defense laws gives everyone far too much leeway in “being scared” of the black kid with his hood up, or the delivery driver that you got too high to remember, or somebody answering the door to an unindicated police raid with a legal gun in their hand.

              • @pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                02 years ago

                People have a legitimate right to defend themselves. For instance waking up to an unannounced armed intruder in your house justifies the use of force. In this case an unhinged large crazy person was actually harassing someone in a threatening way. They weren’t going about their business with a hoodie on, or delivering a pizza. The court agreed with the defendant that it was a self defense situation and so do I.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    65
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What is in the water in Virginia? The video should have killed this case dead. Continuing to advance after being commanded to stop is literally a text book self defense case. Especially when you add in the delivery driver job (one of the most dangerous jobs in the US for violent robbery and car jacking) and the specific intent to disorient and confuse.

    That’s tailor made to elicit a fight or flight response in any reasonable person.

    (Before anyone asks for statistics, delivery drivers make up 1/5th of US work place fatalities according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics)

  • billwashere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 years ago

    Sounds like a good case of “fuck around and find out” to me. Acting aggressively and being a douche just to get views on YouTube is a good way to get shot. Especially when the shooter specifically asked him to stop several times. I really do not like douche nozzles like this guy.

  • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    The prankster evidently has some fans here on lemmy, if this thread is any indication. Bummer. I was hoping lemmy wouldn’t attract people that insufferably stupid.

  • Kalash
    link
    fedilink
    342 years ago

    That’s one way to improve content quality on youtube.

    • @bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Eh, at least pranksters are willing to risk something.

      Too much watered-down content on youtube that just exists to suck up time without ever hurting anyone’s feelings.

  • SSUPII
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    There was no reason for the person to be shot. Disgusting.

      • SSUPII
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The person who shot did it directly, without actually showing what was he carrying. Just showing the gun would have had a better effect with no injuries and no arrest, and that already is going over the top.

        You are an asshole for defending getting hurt for this. I want to assume you would not be so eager to go against the kid if it was your family member.

        • @SaintWacko@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          392 years ago

          Yeah, I can’t believe that while being threatened by a large, erratically acting man, he didn’t think to calmly try to defuse the situation/s

        • teft
          link
          fedilink
          372 years ago

          Just showing the gun is called brandishing and is illegal. You don’t announce you have a weapon before you shoot someone because you could get shot if you do.

          You are an asshole defending an asshole.

        • TherouxSonfeir
          link
          fedilink
          English
          352 years ago

          Are you kidding? Showing the gun to an attacker who is far larger than you is a ridiculous idea. They will just wrestle the gun away. This poor driver got scared out of his wits by a total human trash can who refused to stop when asked. That’s basically rape—of the mind.

          He was attacked. And he defended himself. The YouTuber should be in jail for harassment.

          What world are you living in? Lmfao.

          • SSUPII
            link
            fedilink
            102 years ago

            And in what backwards world are you living where someone had to risk his life for this. The prankster should be punished for harassment, but doesn’t leave the fact that someone SHOT HIM FOR THAT. Nobody should be shot in a situation like this, period.

            • TherouxSonfeir
              link
              fedilink
              English
              342 years ago

              No body should have put the shooter IN this position.

              Don’t go up to people and play loud noises and shove things in their face and keep going even when asked to stop. The YouTuber started it. They should pull his videos, give him community service, and ban him from producing online content for 10 years.

              The driver, the real victim, works a dangerous job and thought he was being attacked. The YouTuber said himself that the videos are designed to confuse and disorient his victims to see how they will react. Well, he found out the hard way what he’s doing is immoral.

              I’m guessing your main problem is the gun itself. I mean, I’m definitely a proponent of gun laws, but I’m smart enough to see who the started it, and who the real victim is.

              • SSUPII
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I can see that completely too. In fact you nailed my problem and that is with the usage of the gun, nothing else.

                The prankster did absolutely wrong, I never tried to reduce that. But at the same time, was there really no other way to manage the situation? I want to wish there was, but at the same time also cannot know and very likely wasn’t. Still, it won’t remove me from being disappointed that it had to end in injury.

                • TherouxSonfeir
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  252 years ago

                  No, there is no other way to manage the situation. You cannot ask a victim to pause step back and kindly ask their attacker to stop. tell me, honestly, would you ask a female rape victim to kindly ask their much larger male attacker to stop? Yes, it is the same thing.

            • @BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              232 years ago

              Nobody was risking their life, the “prankster” was threatening someone in public. I normally am entirely anti-gun, but this was a completely logical use of force to stop someone who you believe is attacking you.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Subjective belief isn’t justification. There were zero verbal or physical threats and plenty of room to just walk the fuck away.

                Lethal force is only moral or legal when there is an imminent threat to your life that is subjectively and objectively reasonable.

                E: ITT, fragile bitches downvote true statements of law.

                • @BURN@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  222 years ago

                  There was absolutely threats. Coming at someone, shoving a phone in their face and aggressively speaking in an unfamiliar language absolutely is a threat.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          262 years ago

          Just showing the gun is legally perilous. It’s a felony called brandishing and diminishes a self defense case. According to the laws and court rulings you are supposed to to keep it holstered until you need it.

          • @bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It’s legal to brandish your weapon in self-defense.

            If it’s legal to shoot someone in a certain self-defense situation, it would also be considered legal to brandish a firearm instead.

    • @jaamesbaxterr@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      Why do I feel more sympathy for the shooter then? Let me explain myself. I don’t condone his actions, but here’s the thing… You have no idea what a stranger is going through in their life. No idea what trauma lies in their past. Going up to strangers and trying to provoke them could yield wildly different responses from person to person, and in the world we live in that could easily involve anger. Some people are barely holding it together and all they need is a jarring incident like this to make them snap. The shooter didn’t provoke this situation. Yes he reacted poorly, but the entire thing would have been avoided if the brain dead YouTuber wasn’t going around trying to elicit a response for clicks.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Righrt, no idea about trauma. If the dude can’t handle someone annoying him in a food court at the mall without resorting to attempted murder, jail is where he belongs, maybe a psych hospital.

        • @RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          232 years ago

          This isn’t just “someone annoying him”, the harasser is a 6’5" dude who walked up to within inches of the shooter, then when the shooter told him to get back and started backing away himself, continued to close the distance. This is open and shut self defense, you don’t get to hunt someone down like that, staying in their personal space, and expect them to not feel threatened. YOU would feel threatened and if you’re telling me otherwise, I have a friend named Billy Bob who’d like to stand silently in your personal space for the remainder of the year.

                • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  152 years ago

                  I’m not terrified of every other human being. Just the tiny portion who refuse to respect personal space and clearly expressed verbal and nonverbal boundary delineations. This isn’t comparable to a stranger calling you over to ask for directions or for some money or help with something.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      Know what my conceal carry instructor told us? If you shoot somebody, you better have made the calculation that spending your life in a concrete and steel box is the better outcome, because that might just be the case.