• Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 days ago

    Love the optimism where they think we’ll all survive until 2027

  • @andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    507 days ago

    60% success rate sounds like a very optimistic take. Investing in a AI startup with 60% chance of success? That’s a VC’s wet dream!

      • ByteOnBikes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 days ago

        If that money funnels to unemployed engineers to set it up… I’m all for it.

        Take the money, do the work, jump ship.

  • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    437 days ago

    Low ball, rookie numbers! I say we go for 90%, including the added costs of re-hiring previous staff or training new ones.

  • @nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    337 days ago

    Only 40%? Would have thought it would be much higher. Don’t more projects generally fail then that without being in a bubble?

    • @mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I suspect they didn’t want to make it sound alarmist or something, but yes the real percentage is likely going to be higher, including a good chunk of “technically finished but remaining unused and forever idle on some box until it’s quietly shut down 5-10 years later.”

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      The numbers are for failures in the next two years. Plenty of projects will coast that long on investment dollars.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      Investors are well aware this is a bubble. But they can’t risk losing the bet when the stakes are the next Google, or even the next internet.

      And no matter what, AI is here to stay and someone is coming out on top.

  • dolphin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 days ago

    40% of what? Just random number of projects these webinar attendees thought of??

    • ByteOnBikes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      Then they’ll go: “Source: my presentation from last year where I made up that number”

      • @frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 days ago

        Seems like every time the hype is about to die, there’s a big announcement about a model breakthrough. The breakthrough usually isn’t as revolutionary as it first appears, but it’s enough to keep funding going.

  • mesa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 days ago

    Sounds like a number pulled out the butt. It will be closer to all of them going by GitHub projects spun up on the timeline, never to be completed.

  • @john_lemmy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 days ago

    Is Gartner one of those sources that causes avalanches in the VC / tech world? Because it would be lovely to see this popping asap